<< Stay Denial[s] from the High Court | Main | Cal Coburn Brown Executed in Washington >>

Why Is the FBI visiting Rev. Jones?


There are news reports that Rev. Terry Jones has called off his constitutionally protected and utterly perverse plan to burn the Koran, in exchange for Imam Rauf's agreement to move the Gound Zero Mosque.  Some later reports cast doubt on this, so at this stage, it cannot be said with assurance whether the Koran burning will go forward.

Lost in these developments is another, quite troubling story.  This is the first line in an AP report filed six hours ago:

GAINESVILLE, Fla. -- FBI agents visited Thursday with a minister of a small Florida church that plans to burn the Quran on Sept. 11, as public safety became a paramount concern and President Barack Obama added his voice to the chorus of opposition.

The wording of this report suggests that the FBI is there to protect public safety.  Having been an attorney with the Justice Department for many years, I do not see how that can be the case.  There may well be public safety concerns (which I guess is a euphemism for the threat of violent retaliation against the Koran burning), but that is the concern of state and local police, not the FBI.  There is no visible nexus whatever for FBI involvement.  So what gives?

Two days ago I observed here:

It's true that Holder is not threatening to punish Jones. But in the First Amendment context, creating a chill is the next "best" thing to an overt threat of punishment. I have not objected to any other officer of the government calling Jones an idiot, including Gen. Patraeus and Sec. Clinton. But they can't send in the FBI...Holder can.

It may be pure coincidence that Jones called this thing off very shortly after the FBI came calling.  For the sake of the Republic, I sure hope it is.


Well, the FBI and the US Marshals Service have been used as rent-a-cops for the politically favored, like abortion clinics and black churches, for years.

Of course, I think this visit was not about protecting a white heterosexual Christian from Muslim terrorists. It was clearly an attempt at intimidation.

I see nothing wrong with law enforcement protecting people they believe are in danger of attack, and when the danger arises from exercise of federally protected rights, that is an appropriate use of federal law enforcement. [Whether abortion should be a federally protected right is, of course, controversial and CJLF takes no position on it. But the executive branch properly enforces the law as it is, regardless of agreement with it.]

I'm not so sure this is clearly an attempt at intimidation. I wasn't at the meeting. Possibly they were informing Rev. Jones of implications of his actions that he was not previously aware of.

If I were the AG either Dem or Repub I'd send someone not so much to intimidate as to point out the unnecessary consequences for our forces serving in Muslim countries. And I would send an agent skilled in negotiation along with a well decorated veteran who has served in Iraq or Afghanistan. Intimidation is the last thing I'd try with a guy of Jones's temperament - unless you have him dead to rights on tax evasion or the like ;-) because I think his whole Koran burning stunt is a response to the element of intimidation probably inherent in the ground zero mosque. If I were going to use the Koran on 9/11 I would simply read the passages therefrom which are used by our Takfiri enemies to justify their murderous totalitarianism. Like the man said: "It's in the book!"

Leave a comment

Monthly Archives