F. Lee Bailey is apparently trying to squeeze more from his participation in the infamous O.J. Simpson trial. Clarke Canfield of AP reports that Bailey claims to have evidence that proves Simpson's innocence but was not introduced at trial.
Uh-huh. So why didn't Simpson's civil lawyers use it when he was being sued for (and ultimately found liable for) every penny he had?
The story concludes with the note that Bailey has been disbarred in Florida and Massachusetts.
Uh-huh. So why didn't Simpson's civil lawyers use it when he was being sued for (and ultimately found liable for) every penny he had?
The story concludes with the note that Bailey has been disbarred in Florida and Massachusetts.
If F. Lee Bailey has evidence that proves O.J. Simpson's innocence, then Jimmy Hoffa is buried in my back yard.