May 2018 Archives
The results of the study should deter the Senate from embracing the FIRST STEP legislation passed by the House just before the BJS figures were published. Indeed, the BJS numbers undermine FIRST STEP in multiple ways.
In 1975, Parson spent six years in the U.S. Army, serving two tours in the Military Police working up to sergeant. He attended night classes at the University of Maryland and University of Hawaii.
Following his military service, in 1981 Parson returned to Hickory County to serve as a deputy. In 1983, he transferred to the Polk County Sheriff's Office to become their first criminal investigator. He purchased his first gasoline station, "Mike's", in 1984. The following year he started a cow and calf operation, becoming a third generation farmer.
Parson served twelve years as Polk County sheriff before being elected to the Missouri House of Representatives in 2004.
En banc review is not appropriate when, as here, a panel opinion faithfully applies Supreme Court precedent. An en banc court would necessarily reach the same result, since Supreme Court precedent precludes any other outcome. I write only to suggest this case might benefit from further attention by the Supreme Court.As the panel opinion explains, the three-part framework of Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463 (1984), governs evaluating whether Congress has disestablished an Indian reservation. But strictly applying Solem's three-part framework in this context, which strongly suggests de facto disestablishment, evokes "the thud of square pegs being pounded into round holes." Parents Involved in Cmty. Sch. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 426 F.3d 1162, 1193 (9th Cir. 2005) (Kozinski, J., concurring), rev'd and remanded, 551 U.S. 701 (2007), and vacated, 498 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2007).
This week we have some good news from Washington County, Oregon. (Hillsboro and vicinity, west of Portland.) Noelle Crombie reports for the Oregonian:
Washington County voters on Tuesday elected a longtime child abuse prosecutor as district attorney, the culmination of a race that saw an unprecedented influx of cash, questions about outside funding, a proliferation of TV ads and a debate about criminal justice in Oregon.
Kevin Barton, 40, a chief deputy district attorney in the county, defeated former Polk County prosecutor and Beaverton criminal defense attorney Max Wall, 40, in a decisive vote. Barton captured 70 percent of the vote in early returns compared to Wall's 30 percent.* * *Combined, the candidates raised about $892,300, according to the latest campaign finance filings. Wall has raised $541,832, with $375,000 from the Oregon Law and Justice political action committee run by a woman with ties to billionaire philanthropist George Soros.
Killer Nanny Gets LWOP: A 55-year-old woman, who worked as a nanny for a New York couple, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for stabbing the family's 2-year-old son and 6-year-old daughter to death with a butcher knife in October of 2012. Jan Ransom of the New York Times reports that Yoselyn Ortega's "untreated mental illness played a significant role" in the crimes according to the sentencing judge. But evidence of her planning for the crime convinced a jury that she should be held responsible for the murders. The children's parents, like many in large cities, relied upon Ortega's assertion on her child care application that she was an experienced nanny. The couple are pushing for legislation to make it a crime to lie on a child care application. The victims' father told the court "It is right that she should live and rot and die in a concrete and metal cage." In a statement delivered in Spanish, Ortega apologized for the killings and asked for forgiveness.
Violent crime in Santa Monica jumped almost 50 percent in 2017 over the previous year, reaching its highest level in two decades, according to police and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) statistics.Data released by the City showed a total of 705 violent crimes in Santa Monica, or 230 more incidents than the 475 reported in 2016 -- a 48 percent increase.
Behind the big jump in violent crimes was a rocketing number of aggravated assaults, the City's data showed. Those crimes increased 67 percent, from 244 incidents in 2016 to 407 reported occurrences last year.
Last year also marked the third year in a row of increases in violent crime, which also includes robbery (up 28 percent from 2016, or 241 incidents), rape (up from 40 in 2016 to 57 in 2017) and homicide (one incident in 2016 and two in 2017).
* * *
As with law enforcement throughout California, Santa Monica police blame much the rise in crime on two statewide measures approved by voters over the past four years.
Here's what the rule would actually do. First, it would require the EPA to identify studies that are used in making regulatory decisions. Second, it would encourage studies to be made publicly available "to the extent practicable." Third, it would define "publicly available" by listing examples of information that could be used for validation, such as underlying data, models, computer code and protocols. Fourth, the proposal recognizes not all data can be openly accessible in the public domain and that restricted access to some data may be necessary. Fifth, it would direct the EPA to work with third parties, including universities and private firms, to make information available to the extent reasonable. Sixth, it would encourage the use of efforts to de-identify data sets to create public-use data files that would simultaneously help protect privacy and promote transparency. Seventh, the proposal outlines an exemption process when compliance is "impracticable." Finally, it would direct the EPA to clearly state and document assumptions made in regulatory analyses.
Modern courts have an issue that the Victorian courts did not, though. Many people with schizophrenia can be made sane for the time being with antipsychotic medication. These meds are a miracle of modern medicine, allowing many people who would otherwise have to be committed to institutions to live outside and have reasonably normal lives.
What happens when a person, while sane, chooses not to take the medication and then commits a crime a time when, for the moment and as a result of his earlier choice, he meets the insanity test? Some defenses can be lost when the defendant created the situation. The defense of self-defense, for example, can be lost if defendant is the initial aggressor in the incident.
George Maliha has an interesting student note in the current issue of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.
New York Attorney General Resigns: Hours after a story in the New Yorker Monday reported that four women had come forward accusing him of physical assaults, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced his resignation. Danny Hakim and Vivian Wang of the New York Times report that Scheiderman, who has played a prominent role in the "Me Too" movement, even filing a lawsuit against a company once run by Harvey Weinstein, said in a statement that the allegations would "prevent me from leading the office's work at this critical time." The resignation came after New York Governor Andrew Cuomo publicly asked him to step down. Two of the four women claiming abuse by Schneiderman did so openly, recounting beatings and abuse during romantic relationships with him. All four recounted similar incidents that they insisted were not consensual. Scheiderman has long been regarded as a rising star in the progressive movement, filing several lawsuits against Trump enterprises and the current administration. The National Organization of Women praised his "unmatched work" in "protecting women who are victims of domestic abuse."
Safest CA Counties Use Death Penalty: Do consequences for crime matter? Liberals go back an forth on this question, passing laws to raise penalties for politically correct offenses like hate crimes, but telling us in the next breath that tough sentencing does not reduce crimes. While it defies common sense to think that consequences have no deterrent effect, death penalty opponents insist that this is true. Phillip Reese of the Sacramento Bee reports that after reviewing which of California's largest counties are most likely to sentence an aggravated murderer to death, it appears that "counties with low homicide rates tended to have a high rate of murderers on death row. Put another way, relatively safe communities tended to send a high rate of murderers to death row." This conclusion is not universal. Los Angeles County, for example, sends about the same ratio of aggravated murderers to death row as, Yolo, Sonoma and Contra Costa Counties, but has a much higher murder rate than the others. On the other hand, Santa Cruz County sends zero murderers to death row, just like San Francisco. Yet San Francisco's murder rate is nearly three times higher.
Soros Dumps $$ Into Sacramento DA's Race: A PAC controlled by progressive billionaire George Soros is funding the campaign of a deputy district attorney running to unseat Sacramento District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert. Candidate Noah Phillips points to the fatal shooting of habitual criminal Stephon Clark last March as evidence that Schubert, along with the rest of Sacramento County law enforcement, is racially biased against people of color. Newsman Mike Luery of KCRA reports that money from Soros is financing Phillips campaign and is paying for a barrage of television commercials parroting the familiar narrative that tells is "We need to end racial profiling and police misconduct. And right now the system is broken." In 2016 Schubert put together a statewide law enforcement task force to track down the notorious "Golden State Killer," known here in Sacramento as the "East Area Rapist." Last week the 72-year-old suspect, identified by DNA evidence, was arrested in a Sacramento suburb. Soros is also bankrolling the progressive candidate in the San Diego District Attorneys race as reported by Allison Ash of KGTV.
The murder of a law enforcement officer has been one of the "special circumstance" categories that makes a defendant eligible for the death penalty ever since capital punishment was reinstated in California in the 1970s. It recognizes that those who were murdered in the line of duty are murdered because they represent society, and the murderous attack is an attack on society. With the recent sentencing of an unrepentant killer who took the lives of two Sacramento-area deputies, there are now 44 individuals on California's death row for the murder of a deputy sheriff or police officer.Contra Costa County is at the north end of the east side of the San Francisco Bay area. (It's name means "the opposite coast.") It leans politically left, but not to the moonbat degree of San Francisco or Oakland. The voters have two other choices in this election, and surely they will have enough sense to choose one of the others.
Thus, it was with shock and revulsion that we read the remarks of a candidate for District Attorney in Contra Costa County. Lawrence Strauss, a candidate for District Attorney announced that if elected, he would not seek the death penalty for defendants who killed a police officer because "it's part of the risk they take." He later qualified the statement to say that he would not seek the death penalty for those who kill only one officer -- as if his "risk they take" argument disappears if multiple officers were killed.
In California, a murder conviction requires a finding of express or implied malice. Express malice requires intent to kill "unlawfully," while implied does not. California Penal Code section 29.4 permits evidence of voluntary intoxication on the issue of whether a defendant "harbored express malice."
At trial, Soto claimed "imperfect" self-defense, which is the actual, but unreasonable, belief that acting in self-defense was necessary. A successful imperfect self-defense claim will result in voluntary manslaughter because "one who holds an honest but unreasonable belief in the necessity to defend against imminent peril to life or great bodily injury does not harbor malice and commits no greater offense than manslaughter."
Good evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children.According to the leader most widely and highly esteemed by our friends on the political left, there is at least one case of murder where the death of the perpetrator is justice and is "true to the values that make us who we are."* * *So Americans understand the costs of war. Yet as a country, we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda's terror: Justice has been done.
Once that matter of principle is settled, the question of which murderers should be put to death is only a matter of degree.
Eugene Volokh has done some empirical research on what "everybody knows," and this time "everybody" is right. After excluding a few oddballs, he concludes:
So, as best I can tell the Court has never -- not once -- in the last 14 years refused a normal, professionally prepared, rules-compliant amicus brief (one that was filed in time, by a nondisbarred lawyer independent of any party, and with normal, substantive legal argument). If you are asked for consent to the filing of an amicus brief in your Supreme Court case, there is basically no upside to refusing, and some modest downside. Just say yes.
FL Airport Shooter Gets Life in Plea Deal: A man who killed five people and wounded six others during a shooting spree at the Fort Lauderdale International Airport last year has agreed to plead guilty in order to avoid the death penalty. Paula McMahon of the Sun/Sentinel reports that part of the agreement requires that Esteban Santiago undergo a mental health examination to assure that he is competent. Ten of the charges stemming from the January 6, 2017 mass shooting qualified Santiago for a death sentence. As part of the plea deal he would give up all rights to appeal his conviction and punishment. Because the murderer was brought up on federal charges, Attorney General Jeff Sessions made the final decision on the deal. While the article notes that typically the federal process takes far longer than most states, there are exceptions. Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was convicted in federal court in 1997 and executed in 2001.