April 2019 Archives

News Scan

| 2 Comments
Chalking Tires--Illegal Search:  In a ruling announced April 22, a unanimous Sixth Circuit panel held that parking enforcement officers in Saginaw, Michigan, are committing an unreasonable search on motorists by chalking tires on parked cars to enforce local parking laws.  Kevin Koeniger of Courthouse News Service reports that the ruling came in a federal lawsuit brought against the city by a woman who had been cited for parking violations 15 times over a 3-year period. In many cities, parking officers patrolling a beat put chalk marks on tires of parked cars to determine if a car has stayed in the same spot beyond the legal time limit.  A district judge dismissed the suit, finding that the chalking fell under a  "community caretaker"  function rather than a law enforcement function.  The court of appeal rejected that holding, concluding that parking officers are enforcing the law and that the city is required to present evidence that chalking tires to enforce a parking law is related to public safety.

No More Fines for Poor Lawbreakers:  A January appeals court decision, called a game-changer by defense attorneys, is rippling across California to eliminate fines for low-income criminal defendants.  The unanimous Second District Court of Appeals ruling in People v. Duenas announced that state courts cannot impose fines for criminal offenses without considering a defendant's ability to pay.  Megan Cassidy of the San Francisco Chronicle reports that, based upon that ruling, a Contra Costa County judge waived the fine for a DUI offender and defense attorneys are appealing cases involving low-income defendants who have been fined.  The decision is part of a trend in California to eliminate fees, fines, and bail bonds for offenses in the name of "economic justice," because they disproportionately impact the poor and homeless.  Working people and retirees who can pay, of course, will still have to.  The California Supreme Court is currently considering a 2018 appeals court ruling which announced that judges must set bail based upon a defendant's ability to pay.  The CJLF brief in that case is here.


News Scan

| No Comments
5-Time Deportee Charged With Murder:  A Honduran man facing a murder charge for beating his girlfriend's 4-month-old boy to death has reportedly been deported 5 times since 2010.  Joshua Rhett Miller of the New York Post reports that Carlos Zuniga-Aviles gave police a fake name when he was arrested in Memphis for murdering the infant earlier this month.  ICE officials said that Zuniga-Aviles had been deported in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2015, and 2016.  He admitted that he had hit the child when he found out the little boy was not his. 

MA Judge Indicted for Obstructing Justice:  A Massachusetts judge and a court officer were indicted Thursday for helping to sneak a twice-deported illegal alien facing drug charges out the back door of the courthouse to prevent an ICE agent waiting in the lobby from taking him into custody.   Katherine Lam of Fox News reports that Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph and court officer Wesley MacGregor plead not guilty to charges of obstruction of justice, conspiracy and aiding and abetting, although they were recorded on an open microphone discussing how to prevent the defendant from being arrested by ICE.  The defendant, Jose Medina-Perez, a twice-deported illegal immigrant with a fugitive warrant for drunken driving in Pennsylvania, had been in Joseph's courtroom for arraignment on drug charges.  Strangely, a story in the Greenfield Recorder left out the tape-recorded statements made by the judge and Medina-Perez's attorney about how to prevent his arrest.  But the Recorder story did include quotes from the MA Attorney General calling the indictment "politically motivated" and the ACLU which called the case "preposterous, ironic, and deeply damaging to the rule of law."

Judging Those Who Judge Judges

| No Comments
The California State Auditor has this report on the California Commission on Judicial Performance. Among the recommendations are to split the CJP into an investigative body to investigate and bring charges and an adjudicative body to determine the charges. That would require an amendment to the state constitution.

Apology Tour

| No Comments
Rafael Mangual of the Manhattan Institute has this op-ed in the WSJ on former Veep Joe Biden and criminal justice. He was mostly right the first time.

Even before announcing that he would seek the Democratic presidential nomination, Joe Biden was busy apologizing. At a Martin Luther King Day speech to Al Sharpton's National Action Network, Mr. Biden said "I haven't always been right" about criminal justice and "white America has to admit there's still a systematic racism and it goes almost unnoticed by so many of us."

Not long ago Mr. Biden publicly defended his role in shaping the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which funded the hiring of more cops and encouraged more "truth in sentencing" by requiring that prisoners actually serve the majority of their sentences before becoming eligible for parole. That law, Barack Obama's vice president said in 2016, "restored American cities." Mr. Biden, who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1994, reiterated that view in his 2017 memoir.

Execution of Dragging Murderer

| 1 Comment
The execution of John William King, noted in Tuesday's News Scan, was carried out yesterday after the Supreme Court denied a stay. No dissent is noted.

12News in Beaumont, Texas has this video of the statement of Clara Byrd Taylor on behalf of the family of her brother, James Byrd:

Today, we witnessed the peaceful and dignified execution of John King for the savage, brutal, and inhumane murder of James on June 7, 1998 -- really a modern-day lynching.
Dear Governor Newsom:

If the murderer described in Cresencio Rodriguez-Delgado's story in the Fresno Bee is, in fact, convicted of the new crime charged, what punishment do you think is appropriate?

(a) Death

(b) No punishment at all (a.k.a. a life sentence for a person already sentenced to life in prison)
The U.S. Supreme Court today finished its oral arguments for the current term, which began on the first Monday of last October. The court heard Quarles v. United States, No. 17-778, yet another case on how to handle the varying definitions of crimes in our 50 states for the purpose of the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. The transcript is here.

Does a person have a prior conviction of "burglary" for the ACCA when he was convicted under a law that defines mental element of burglary as either intending to commit a crime at the time of entry (the common law definition) or alternatively forming that intent after entry (as many states allow)? Note that a person who actually committed the common law crime would still get off if the court requires the narrower definition, because under the "categorical approach" it is only how the crime is defined, not what the perpetrator actually did, that counts.
The district attorneys of Sacramento, Riverside, Fresno, and Imperial Counties have this op-ed with the above title at CNN.

Gov. Gavin Newsom's blanket moratorium on California's death penalty is a slap in the face to crime victims and their families who have waited years for justice. With the stroke of his pen last month, Newsom singlehandedly undermined our state's democratic values and our criminal justice system.

The Murderer Vote

| 14 Comments
Aamer Madhani reports in USA Today:

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders said he thinks every U.S. citizen, even the convicted Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, should be allowed to vote in American elections.

Sanders offered his stance at a CNN town hall Monday when asked whether he thought felons should be allowed to vote while they're incarcerated, not just after their release.
But that's just Crazy Bernie, right? Right?

News Scan

| No Comments
Texas to Execute Hate Crime Murderer:  One of the worst hate crime murderers in the country faces execution in Texas tomorrow.  John King, a habitual felon, was the ringleader in the torture and murder of a black man in 1998.  Ellen McGirt of Fortune reports that on June 7, 1998, John King, Lawrence Brewer, and Shaun Berry (all white ex-cons), lured James Byrd Jr., a black man, into their pickup in the small town of Jasper.  The criminals beat him, pulled down his pants, chained him to the rear bumper, and dragged him down a rural road until his body was ripped apart.  The trio left Byrd's body, minus his head and one arm, in front of a black church.  A more detailed description of the crime is provided in the direct appeal.  King was convicted and sentenced to death in 1999.  Brewer was also sentenced to death and executed in 2011. Berry is serving LWOP for his part in the murder.  The evidence of guilt was overwhelming and included King's incriminating statements.  It is important to note that opponents of the death penalty believe that King should be allowed to keep his life and that his execution amounts to government sanctioned murder.
Tomorrow, the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral argument in Mitchell v. Wisconsin, No.18-6210. Amy Howe has this preview at SCOTUSblog.

Mueller Report Executive Summaries

| No Comments
For the convenience of our readers, I have extracted the executive summaries of the two volumes of the Mueller Report and uploaded the combined document here.

This is for readers who (1) don't have time to read 448 pages but do have time to read 13; and (2) would rather read a report's author's summary of what it says rather what someone else says are the "highlights."

Exoneration Deflation

| 1 Comment

Today, April 18, 2019, American journalism brims over with awareness that a prosecutor's decision not to pursue criminal charges does not necessarily mean that the person in question is actually innocent. It is not "exoneration" as that term is widely understood.

Mark the date on the calendar and count the days until the next report that refers to the Death Penalty Information Center's so-called "innocence list" of supposedly "exonerated" former death row inmates as if the people on it actually are innocent. I predict it won't be long. Memory is short, and confirmation bias is powerful.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today announced its decision in United States v. California, No. 18-16496. The federal government sued California over a package of bills designed to hamper efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. CJLF supported a portion of the argument, and the United States prevailed in the district court as to that part. See this post last July. California did not appeal that portion.

The district court ruled in favor of California on the remainder, and the United States appealed. The court of appeals reversed as to one portion. AB 103 provides for inspection of state, local, and private facilities used to house immigration detainees (i.e., all except the federal government's own facilities). Inspecting for health and safety on the same basis as other detention facilities is okay, but requirements that apply only to federal operations and authorize looking into "due process" and "the circumstances around their apprehension" crosses the line on intergovernmental immunity. The panel relies on a Supreme Court decision two months ago, Dawson v. Steager, for the proposition that there is no de minimis exception to the anti-discrimination aspect of the intergovernmental immunity doctrine.

News Scan

| 7 Comments
DOJ: 21.9% of Federal Inmates Are Illegals:  In the face of reports that illegal aliens commit less crime than native-born Americans, such as this one from the Washington Post, a U.S. Justice Department report released earlier this year found that illegals still commit a lot of crimes.  Of the 170,346 criminals serving time in federal prison, 37,242 or 21.9% are illegal aliens.  According to a 2016 PEW Research study, illegals make up 3.3% of the U.S. population.  The DOJ report also found that just under 36% of all defendants charged with federal crimes were illegals.  The Washington Post report also shows that based upon criminal convictions in Texas, illegals commit roughly three times as many crimes as legal immigrants and almost five times as many homicides.  Those who argue that this is the result of racially biased police need to explain how police distinguish illegal from legal immigrants when arresting them for crimes, when the immigration status of suspects is typically not confirmed until after the suspect is in custody.  If all that matters is the aggregate numbers, then significant gender bias is also at play, as over 93% of federal prison inmates are male. 

News Scan

| No Comments
SCOTUS Denies Gay Murderer's Bias Petition:  The U.S. Supreme Court declined review of a South Dakota murderer's claim that his death sentence is invalid because jurors were biased against gays.  Ariane de Vogue of CNN reports that Charles Rhines admitted killing 22-year old Donnivan Schaeffer in 1992 while robbing the Rapid City donut shop where Schaeffer worked.  Following his conviction, the jury learned that Rhines was gay, which his attorneys argued swayed the jury to sentence him to death.  While most states consider jury deliberations to be private, in its 2017 Pena-Rodriquez v. Colorado ruling, the Supreme Court announced an exception for alleged racial bias.  Rhines asked that the exception also include gay bias.  South Dakota argued that the lower courts were correct in finding that the claim was proceduraly barred because it could have been raised years earlier.  The brutality of the murder seems sufficient to justify the death sentence.  As the South Dakota Supreme Court noted on direct appeal,  Rhines was stealing money from the donut shop office when he heard Schaeffer come in the front door.  Rhines pulled a knife and waited behind the office door until Schaeffer entered, then stabbed him in the stomach.  Schaeffer fell to the floor and began screaming while Rhines stabbed him again in the back, piercing his lung.  As Schaeffer begged for his life, Rhines walked him into a storage room, sat him on a pallet and forced his head between his knees.  Rhines then stabbed Schaeffer in the back of the neck, severing his brain stem.  According to Rhines confession, when Schaeffer continued to shake, he tied his hands behind his back.  The forensic pathologist testified that Schaeffer was probably already dead and the shaking was involuntary.     

News Scan

| 13 Comments
Just 10% View Police as Racist:  A national poll released on April 11, found that 10% of adults interviewed consider the police racist.  The Rasmussen poll, which interviewed 1,000 American adults between April 8-9 found that 70% of those responding to the question "Are most police officers racist?" said no, leaving 20% undecided.  The poll, which we could not find reported in any newspaper or news source other then Rasmussen itself, seems to indicate that most adults do not accept the "police are racist" narrative relaunched prominently in 2008 by then Attorney General Eric Holder and parroted without skepticism by the national media over the past decade. 

Social Justice Prosecutors:  An article with that title in the American Thinker by scholar and author Derrick Wilburn details the rise of the graduates from prominent law schools, steeped in progressive dogma, which are "Now finding themselves in positions of power..."  Wilburn notes that "these social justice warriors have a deep-rooted belief in the fundamental unfairness of America in general, and our judicial system in particular."  The behavior of Cook County Illinois State's Attorney Kim Foxx and recently elected Suffolk County (MA) District Attorney Rachel Rollins suggest that declining to prosecute crimes disproportionately committed by minorities is the correct approach to bring about social justice. "While they publicly state a belief that their reforms are `making communities safer,' it's difficult to see how.  What they are really doing is enabling criminal behavior in the name of `fairness and equality.'"

Bucklew Teleforum Podcast

| No Comments
The recording of my April 4 Federalist Society Teleforum on Bucklew v. Precythe is now available as podcast here.

Much Ado About N-2

| 1 Comment
In the "wee hours" this a.m., the U.S. Supreme Court vacated stays issued by U.S. District Court in Alabama and the Eleventh Circuit to give the green light for the green mile for murderer Christopher Price. Price's well-deserved sentence of death was imposed for the savage and treacherous murder of Alabama minister Bill Lynn. Alabama has approved nitrogen hypoxia as an alternate method of execution, but it is not yet operational. Although the deadline to elect that method lapsed last June, at a time when Price was represented by counsel and could have easily made the election, his lawyers successfully exploited the situation to get a further delay in justice that is already long overdue.

Unfortunately, Alabama death warrants expire at midnight, and early a.m. of April 12 was too late. Ivana Hrynkiw has this story for al.com.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall released a statement after the announcement was made. "Tonight, in the middle of National Crime Victims' Rights Week, the family of Pastor Bill Lynn was deprived of justice. They were, in effect, re-victimized by a killer trying to evade his just punishment. This 11th-hour stay for death row inmate Christopher Price will do nothing to serve the ends of justice. Indeed, it has inflicted the opposite--injustice, in the form of justice delayed."

The vote was 5-4.

News Scan

| No Comments
Big Fentanyl Bust at Southern Border:  A joint operation between the U.S. Border Patrol and the San Diego Sheriffs Department has resulted in the arrest of a Fullerton couple attempting to bring 44 1bs. of fentanyl into California Thursday.  Kristina Davis of the San Diego Union Tribune reports that the drug had an estimated street value of $1.5 million.  Drug traffickers now favor fentanyl, which is 50 times stronger than heroin, because it is cheap to produce and more easily smuggled.  The drug is primarily sourced from China and shipped to Mexico to be smuggled across the U.S. southern border.  Conservative estimates by DHS indicate that they catch roughly half of the illegal aliens and smugglers attempting to cross the border.   

Crimes on a Plane

| No Comments
What is the appropriate venue for a crime committed on an airplane in flight? United States v. Lozoya, No. 17-50336, decided today by the Ninth Circuit grapples with that problem. The case is only a misdemeanor assault, but the problem could arise in much more serious cases.

Is it even within the capacity of Congress to fix? There are constitutional limitations on trial outside the state where the crime was committed. See U.S. Const. art. III ยง 2 & Amdt. 6. The former provision also says, "but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as Congress may by Law have directed." It would make sense for all airspace above a certain altitude to be federal territory, but that would raise constitutional questions of its own.

Incoherent on Immigration

| No Comments
The WSJ has this editorial:

Frustrated with Congress and the courts on border security, President Trump has responded by firing his own immigration-enforcement deputies. This political incoherence won't produce better results at the border or break the stalemate in Congress over immigration.

News Scan

| No Comments
CA Law Proposed to Shorten Parole:  A California Assemblywoman has introduced a bill that would shorten the time that dangerous criminals released from prison are supervised on parole.  Michele Hanisee, President of the Association of Los Angeles Deputy District Attorneys, reports that AB1182 by Assemblywoman Wendy Carrillo, D-Los Angeles, would reduce parole supervision from one year to 180 days for serious felons, including sex offenders.  It would shave a year off the time on parole for high risk criminals released from prison, and it would discharge offenders from parole if they go six months without a violation.  This follows other sentencing reforms aimed at reducing incarceration for habitual criminals including; AB109 which transferred most felons coming out of prison from parole to county probation and eliminated prison time for most property and drug felonies; Proposition 47, which turned a host of felonies into misdemeanors encouraging thieves to continue stealing, and SB1391, which prohibits the worst murderers under age 16 from being tried in adult court, gifting those convicted in juvenile court with release at age 25.  Recent surveys by two liberal think tanks in San Francisco reporting that crime is down in California are fake news.  DAs and Sheriffs are telling us that thousands of property crimes converted to misdemeanors are no longer reported to police and all kinds of theft, burglaries, car break-ins and drug crimes are rising in every community.  As noted in an earlier post, the FBI preliminary crime report for 2018 found that violent crime had increased in 58.3% of the state's largest cities.     

News Scan

| No Comments
Will SCOTUS Decide Homeless Camping Ban?  In a ruling announced last week the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc of its holding last September which prohibits enforcement of local laws banning the homeless from camping on public property.  As reported by Matt Tinoco from Laist, in Martin v. City of Boise the court said "As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property..."  With reconsideration by the Ninth Circuit off the table, the only avenue left to the plaintiffs is an appeal to the Supreme Court, which the City of Boise hinted to in a statement released after the ruling last week, "[Monday's] ruling does not mean the city ordinances are (unconstitutional). It simply has the effect of forcing the matter to be litigated further. Therefore, the city's camping and disorderly conduct ordinances remain in effect until further clarification can be obtained from the courts; the ruling will not cause us to change our procedures." 
The U.S. Supreme Court has denied a stay in the challenge to a regulation that expands the definition of "machine guns" (which are illegal) to include "bump-stock-type devices" which make semi-automatic guns function like full automatics, i.e., machine guns. The petition, with the D.C. Circuit opinion attached, is here.

The order notes that Justices Thomas and Gorsuch would grant the stay. I suspect that their position may have more to do with antipathy to "Chevron deference" than sympathy with owners of bump stocks.

CJLF generally does not get involved in the gun-control fight. I really cannot fathom any legitimate reason for owning a bump stock, though.

Jamming Prison Cell Phones

| 5 Comments
Sherri Lydon, US Attorney for South Carolina, has this op-ed in the WSJ, calling for Congress to amend communications law so that state prisons can jam smuggled cell phones, just as federal prisons do. Inmates use the phones to continue running their crime organizations from within prison.

In addition, in my opinion, prison need to do--and need to be allowed to do--a better job of stopping smuggling generally. When I visited San Quentin a few years back, I was appalled to see that you can get into a prison with less sophisticated scanning than you get boarding an airplane. Our guide said they were going to get the advanced scanners, but the prisoner rights lobby squawed so loudly about invading the privacy of the visitors that they had to back off. There should also be a zero tolerance, one-strike rule for both visitors and staff caught smuggling: one offense and you never visit/work there again.

USDOJ Report on Alabama Prisons

| 1 Comment
The U.S. Department of Justice has issued a report on Alabama prisons. The press release is here and the transmittal letter and full report are here.

The principal problem is failure to prevent further crimes by criminals already sentenced to prison. "The Department concluded that there is reasonable cause to believe that the men's prisons fail to protect prisoners from prisoner-on-prisoner violence and prisoner-on-prisoner sexual abuse, and fail to provide prisoners with safe conditions." The fact that the victims of these crimes are mainly other inmates is not a reason to tolerate this.

Prisons should be as secure as they need to be to incapacitate criminals from committing more crimes for the duration of their term. I haven't read the whole report yet, but the incidents described in the introduction all appear to be of the insufficient security variety.

News Scan

| 1 Comment
Deported Murderer Rearrested:  An admitted MS13 gang member deported after serving time for a 2000 murder, was arrested Tuesday on Long Island.  Priscilla DeGregory and Ben Feuerherd of the New York Post report that William Umberto Martinez Chavez was deported in 2017 after serving time for the stabbing murder of a man in Huntington Station.  Chavez, who claims he is no longer affiliated with MS13, faces a maximum of 20 years in federal prison if convicted.  ICE authorities report that for every illegal alien caught at the border, three others enter the U.S. undetected.   

A Rule to Speed Up Confirmations

| 6 Comments
The WSJ has this editorial on a move by Senate Republicans to speed up confirmations. The rule would eliminate the requirement for 30 hours of debate for a cloture vote for lower-level nominees, excluding cabinet secretaries and appellate court nominees. The WSJ notes that in 2013, when the shoe was on the other foot and the Democrats had both the White House and a Senate majority, Senator McConnell agreed to only 8 hours. For the last two years, though, Democrats have required the full 30 hours even for unopposed nominees to such uncontroversial offices as the Federal Railroad Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Obstructing these nominees is nothing but governmental vandalism.

We at C&C are particularly interested in the long-delayed nominations to the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

Pistol Packin' Mama

| No Comments
AP reports from Barboursville, West Virginia:

News outlets report 54-year-old Mohamed Fathy Hussein Zayan of Alexandria, Egypt, was arraigned Monday night in Cabell County Magistrate Court on a felony charge of attempted abduction.

According to a criminal complaint, a woman was shopping with her 5-year-old daughter at the Huntington Mall in Barboursville when a man grabbed the girl by the hair and tried to pull her away. Police say the mother pulled out a gun and told the suspect to let go of the child. The man released the child and was later detained by mall security and Barboursville police near a food court.

News Scan

| No Comments
2nd Conviction in NY Jogger Murder:  Following a mistrial last November, a New York jury returned a unanimous guilty verdict against Chanel Lewis for the 2016 sexual assault and murder of 30-year-old jogger Karina Vetrano.  Katherine Lam of Fox News reports that the victim's body was found in a marsh near her Queens home.  Evidence included a DNA match for Lewis found on the victim's neck, fingernails and cellphone, along with his taped confession to police.  One juror in the retrial told reporters that he felt pressured to find him guilty, but said later that he believed that justice had been served. The NY Legal Aid Society representing Lewis called the conviction a "complete miscarriage  of justice," citing the last-minute discovery of an anonymous letter questioning his guilt, a "race-based dragnet" in collecting his DNA and a coerced confession.   Lewis will be sentenced later this month. 
On its face, the U.S. Supreme Court case of Bucklew v. Precythe, No. 17-8151, seemed to present a fairly narrow issue. The State of Missouri is generally among the best of the states in the way it carries out executions. That state has remained able to acquire the drug of choice, pentobarbital. Even so, Bucklew claimed that due to his unusual medical condition use of the barbiturate-only lethal injection method would be unconstitutionally cruel as applied to him.

The opinion of the Court by Justice Gorsuch for a bare majority not only rejects that argument, but sweeps in a lot along the way. At the beginning of the discussion of the law (i.e., part II, after the summary of facts and case) we have this remarkable paragraph:

The Constitution allows capital punishment. [Cites to Glossip and Baze and discussion of founding-era punishment and recognition of capital cases in Fifth Amendment.] Of course, that doesn't mean the American people must continue to use the death penalty. The same Constitution that permits States to authorize capital punishment also allows them to outlaw it. But it does mean that the judiciary bears no license to end a debate reserved for the people and their representatives.

That is the strongest statement of the unquestionable constitutionality of capital punishment that I have ever seen in an opinion of the Court, rather than in a concurring or dissenting opinion. It is as emphatic as the absolute statement of Justice Hugo Black (who was fond of absolute statements) nearly half a century ago in McGautha v. California.

The U.S. Supreme Court this morning rejected the claim of Russell Bucklew that his unusual medical condition required the state to execute him by the never-yet-used method of nitrogen hypoxia rather than the single-drug lethal injection method of a massive overdose of a barbiturate, the optimum widely-used method for most cases.

Looking quickly over the opinion, it appears to be a strong reaffirmation of the decision four years ago in Glossip v. Gross. The decision was 5-4, with Justice Gorsuch writing the opinion of the Court.

I will have more to say when I have read the opinion more thoroughly.

Update: To say there are nuggets in this opinion would be an understatement. This is the Mother Lode.

Monthly Archives