October 2019 Archives

A Ninth Circuit panel today decided City of Los Angeles v. Barr, No. 18-56292, holding that the statute authorizing the federal Byrne Justice Assistance Grants did not empower DOJ to condition the grants on local law enforcement giving DHS notice that a detained alien would be released or giving DHS agents access to detained aliens. This is statutory interpretation, not constitutional law.

We conclude that the 2006 amendment to § 10102(a)(6) confirms that the Attorney General and the Assistant AG through delegation have the authority to impose special conditions on all grants and determine priority purposes for formula grants, as those terms are properly circumscribed. The notice and access conditions are not special conditions placed on grants to grantees that exhibit certain risk factors or have idiosyncratic issues that must be addressed individually. Nor are they among the statutorily recognized purposes of a Byrne JAG award as set out in § 10152(a). Therefore, DOJ lacked statutory authority to impose them under §10102(a)(6).
The panel divided 2-1 over how much authority the statute actually does give DOJ, however.

News Scan

| 4 Comments
Jury Gives Death Penalty to Hollywood Ripper:  An article in Courthouse News Service reports that multiple murderer, Michael Garguilo, known as the Hollywood Ripper, has received the death penalty from a unanimous jury.  Under California law the sentencing jury reaches a verdict, rather than making a recommendation, regarding whether a capital murderer should receive a death sentence or life without the possibility of parole.  Technically, the judge announces the sentence after the jury reaches its verdict, but it is extremely rare for a judge to reject the jury's decision.  Garguilo, was convicted for the brutal stabbing murders of Ashley Ellerin, 22, Maria Bruno, 32, and the attempted murder of Michelle Murphy, between 2001 and 2008.  The victims were killed by a distinct pattern of stab wounds, and substantial evidence including a DNA match, tied Garguilo to the crimes.  DNA evidence also tied him to the 1993 stabbing murder of an 18-year-old woman in Illinois who lived in his neighborhood.  This case was widely publicized because Ashton Kutcher was called to testify about his connection to one of the victims.  While Garguilo's attorneys claimed that his alleged mental illness diminished his responsibility of the killings, the jury did not accept this defense. 

News Scan

| No Comments
CA Poll Finds Crime and Homelessness Top Concerns:  A recent poll of registered California voters reports that 79% believe that homelessness and criminal behavior are major concerns that state politicians should address. 73% reported that street crime has become a serious problem and 60% say they no longer feel safe today.  The wide ranging poll conducted in late September by the California Chamber of Commerce also asked respondents for their views on job creation, the economy, housing, and quality of life issues in the Golden State.  Over the past eight years the state has rolled out aggressive criminal justice reforms, with voter support for ballot measures decreasing sentences such as Propositions 47 and 57.  The recent poll indicates that the public now believes that there is more crime in their communities and that it is threatening their safety.  A report from the National Insurance Crime Bureau tends to support this concern finding that five of the nation's ten metropolitan areas with the highest rate of auto thefts were in California.  No other state had more than one. 

Mexican Nationals Charged in Officer's Murder:  Two citizens of Mexico have been arrested and charged in last Wednesday's murder of El Dorado County Sheriffs Deputy Brian Ishmael.  Lloyd Billingsley of the California Globe reports that Deputy Ishmael was responding to a call regarding theft at a marijuana grow when the suspects opened fire, killing him.  Carlos Vazquez-Orozco, 20 and Romiro Bravo Morales, 22, were taken into custody for the shooting.  A third man, the owner of what turned out to be an illegal marijuana farm, was also arrested and charged with involuntary manslaughter.  Due to California's sanctuary state law (SB54), the El Dorado County Sheriff suggested that the immigration status of the two shooters was not available to his office, but ICE officials told the Globe that the legal status of the suspects would be determined.  The murdered deputy, 37, leaves a wife and three daughters behind.  
UPDATE:  KCRA reports that the two Mexicans charged with killing Deputy Ishmael are illegal aliens.

We're Back

| No Comments
C&C has been off the air since Tuesday morning. Our web host, Bluehost, migrated our site to a new server. However, they botched the move, failed to get the internet pointers pointing to the new location correctly, failed to fix the problem in a timely manner, and failed to effectively communicate with us regarding the outage, its cause, and its duration. Needless to say, we will be looking for a new host before the end of our present term.

News Scan

| 1 Comment
Study Casts Doubt on Racial Bias in Police Shootings:  A study published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences adds to the list of academic papers which provide evidence against the widely accepted claim that police shootings of black and Hispanic males are driven by racial bias.  The study "Officer characteristics and racial disparities in fatal officer-involved shootings," performed by five Psychology professors from Michigan State University and the University of Maryland, created a detailed database on fatal officer involved shootings which included the race and sex of the officers as well as the victims and accounted for the level of violent crime in the community where the shootings occurred.  The study found that the widely used benchmark of comparing the percentage of a given race in the population to the percentage of that race who are shot by police, is misleading because the exposure of members of different races to situations where police shootings are the most frequent vary widely.  "We find no evidence of anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparities across shootings, and White officers are not more likely to shoot minority civilians than non-White officers.  Instead, race-specific crime strongly predicts civilian race."

News Scan

| No Comments
Illegal Alien Arrested in Seattle Murder:  An illegal alien from El Salvador has been arrested for the brutal machete murder of a 16-year-old high school student.  Michael Spears of KIRO 7 reports that the partially dismembered body of Juan Carlos Con Guzman was found in a river last month.  20-year-old Carlos Iraheta-Vega has been named as a suspect in the murder.  Iraheta-Vega entered the country as an unaccompanied minor protected from deportation under the Obama Administration's DACA program.  According to federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials, Iraheta-Vega was arrested three times, including twice for drunk driving.  On each occasion ICE asked King County police to hold him for deportation, but because King is a sanctuary county, he was released back into the community.  Local officials and an immigrant rights activist responded that the police would have violated the local sanctuary law if they had held Iraheta-Vega for ICE agents.  Now a teen-aged boy is dead. 

News Scan

| No Comments
Newsom Signs Batch of Criminal Justice Reforms: Courthouse News Service reports that California Governor Gavin Newsom signed several criminal justice bills last week, adding to the wide-ranging reforms of his predecessor, Jerry Brown.  A few of these changes include: banning facial recognition on police body cameras, easing mandatory sentences, and making it easier to expunge criminal records. The banning of facial recognition on police body cameras is based on the concern that facial recognition cameras "turn body cameras into a 24-hour surveillance tool". Police argue that facial recognition technology allows them to identify suspects. Another bill will remove the one-year sentence increase for each prior prison or jail term.  Proponents claim that the new law will save millions of dollars from prison and jail costs.  Many in law enforcement opposed the bill believing that repeat felons should serve longer sentences.  Another measure would allow the state to expunge the criminal records for offenders who have completed their sentences, to enable them to secure jobs and housing. Gov. Newsom stated that these bills, "show a new path to ensure our state moves closer toward a more equitable criminal justice system," the goal he has to make sure those who were or are incarcerated have a new chance at life once they get released. It is unclear how many serious habitual felons and gang members will benefit from the reduced sentences and erased criminal records provided by these new laws.
Jacob Gershman reports in the WSJ:

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that David Boies' law firm can't represent an alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein in her defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, escalating a feud between two of the country's most prominent attorneys.
*      *      *
Here are some initial impressions after reading the transcript in the D.C. Sniper case of Mathena v. Malvo, argued today in the U.S. Supreme Court. (See yesterday's post for background and links.)

The Court is in a difficult situation because of the Montgomery opinion's dishonest misrepresentation of what Miller actually held. To make Miller retroactive under the Teague rule, Montgomery had to pound a round (procedural) peg into a square (substantive) hole. I don't think they want to publicly admit that the Court did that only a few years ago, but the difficulties are becoming apparent.

I'm sure Justice Kagan would like the Court to just accept Montgomery's recasting of Miller on its face and endorse an intrusive rule for federal micromanagement of juvenile LWOP sentencing, just like the monstrosity we have for capital sentencing. I would be surprised if she has a majority for that. I think Justice Alito (and probably Justice Thomas) would like to overrule Montgomery. I doubt they have a majority for that. Justice Gorsuch seems inclined to a narrow reading of Montgomery, though, because a broad one would implicate the Apprendi rule.

Justices Ginsburg and Breyer question the Virginia Supreme Court's holding that the Virginia system actually was discretionary at the time of Malvo's sentencing. The Fourth Circuit assumed that was correct. They could send the case back to reconsider that point.

With this many splits among the Justices, there is no predicting the outcome.

Amy Howe's report of the argument is here.
Tomorrow the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case of the younger of the D.C. Sniper pair, Lee Boyd Malvo. The case is Mathena v. Malvo, No. 18-217.CJLF's amicus brief in the case is here. Our press release is here.

In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Miller v. Alabama that life in prison without possibility of parole could not be a mandatory sentence for murderers under 18 at the time of the crime. The decision effectively extended to juvenile LWOP the long-standing rule for capital cases for adults. See Woodson v. North Carolina (1976); Sumner v. Shuman (1987).

The bigger problem is the 2016 decision in Montgomery v. Louisiana. The core holding of that case is that Miller applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. In the course of reaching that result, however, there is a lot of expansive language regarding what must be considered before deciding that a 17-year-old should never be released for, e.g., gunning down 12 people, chosen at random, in cold blood. For the Supreme Court to vastly expand a rule in the process of deciding it is retroactive would be remarkable, to say the least. It would be especially strange to impose new requirements in states that have discretionary juvenile LWOP in a case that is about mandatory juvenile LWOP.

The Court's docket, with links to the documents in the case, is here. Amy Howe has this preview at Howe on the Court. Update: Kevin Daley has this article at the Daily Caller.

Update 2 (10/16): The transcript of oral argument is now available.

Misdemeanor Arrests Decline

| No Comments
Studies indicate that misdemeanor arrests have dropped substantially over the past several years particularly in big cities.  Jacob Gershman reports in the Wall Street Journal that some experts see the drop as evidence of a "very deep reset of the fundamental relationship between police and public."  New York City saw misdemeanor arrests drop by 50% since 2010, with black men as the major beneficiaries.  In St. Louis the arrest rate for black men declined by 80% since 2005, while Los Angeles saw a 47% drop in misdemeanor arrests since 2008.  But as the article notes, many experts are confused about what is causing this drop. U.C. Irvine professor Alexandra Natapoff is probably correct in observing that "misdemeanor enforcement is much less sensitive to actual crime rates and influenced by changing political and cultural winds."  The annual numbers, even for reported felonies, is a lagging indicator which, while helpful in determining trends, does not accurately reflect the amount of crime in a given community. 

News Scan

| No Comments
Feds Backstop CA's Weak Sentencing of Gun Criminals:  The State of California has some of the toughest laws restricting gun and ammunition ownership and purchases in the country, but the penalties for criminals with guns are so soft, District Attorneys are allowing the worst gun criminals to face prosecution under federal law.  Barbara Harvey of Cal Matters reports that while Governor Newsom noisily signed 15 gun safety laws this month to limit possession of firearms by the law abiding public, the sentences for criminal  possession of firearms have been weakened by reforms aimed at keeping criminals out of prison.  Under California law a criminal with serious priors caught in possession of a firearm might serve a 3 year sentence in prison or county jail with half off for good behavior.  Under federal law the same criminal faces 10 years in federal prison and must serve 85% of that sentence before being considered for parole.  As a result, District Attorneys are partnering with U.S. Attorneys to have the worst gun criminals prosecuted in federal court under Project Safe Neighborhoods, a program initiated by President George W. Bush, abandoned during the Obama Administration, and revived by the Trump Administration.  U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott, whose jurisdiction covers 34 California counties from Bakersfield to the Oregon and Nevada borders, said that his office is aggressively prosecuting "people with lengthy criminal records, prior convictions for crimes of violence.....because those are the problems in these communities."  A bill to increase the sentence for criminal possession of a firearm died last year in the Assembly Public Safety Committee, chaired by Los Angeles Democrat Reggie Jones-Sawyer, who opposes any bill that would add prison time.         
In writing my review of John Pfaff's anti-incarceration book Locked In, I was particularly struck by his argument that the absence of the incarcerated, criminal parent from the household was bad for the children and therefore an unaccounted-for cost to society.

This seemed to me to be a bad case of "Can't See the Trees for the Forest Syndrome," i.e., the fallacy of finding a fact that is true for the average of a group and assuming it is true for every member of the group.

News Scan

| No Comments
No Place for the Mentally ill:  In an article published in The Hill, Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey laments the predicament facing many law enforcement agencies, particularly in larger cities: a hefty percentage of the homeless and people arrested for crimes are mentally ill.  "And this is usually not a one-time event, as mentally ill people are frequently arrested repeatedly, but are rarely connected to the help they need.  Every year over a million people with serious mental illness are booked into jail."  While she doesn't say, we assume this is for LA County. The District Attorney makes the case for a mental-health diversion program she has implemented which attempts to connect mentally ill arrestees with community mental health services.  The problem is, there are not enough service providers to meet the demand, and often the client needs more than the short-term care than providers can give.

Brainless Experts to the Rescue

| No Comments
In a recent post, we reported on a new guidance by the New York Commission on Human Rights that declared that use of the term "illegal alien" was a form of harassment and that offenders could be fined $250,000.  Former civil rights attorney Hans Bader noted that this is a clear violation of the First Amendment, and that the term is commonly used in both federal statutes and Supreme Court decisions.  In a story in the Chicago Tribune reporter Cindy Dampier went to an "expert," Professor Claire Thomas, director of the Asylum Clinic at New York Law School, to correct this fallacy, "....it's commonplace knowledge that the term 'illegal alien' is pejorative," she says, "and that a person who wants to spread hate in this city of immigrants will face consequences."  The "expert" also pointed out another common misconception: That the term supposedly is not used in statutes and in legal circles. "The term illegal alien isn't a term that comes up in our laws," she says, noting that it does appear very rarely in pieces of federal legislation. "However, the term 'alien' is in our statutes, and you will hear people referred to as 'the alien,' when you are representing them."  Apparently, Professor Thomas' expertise does not include an understanding of Title 8 of the United States Code at 8 USC 1365 and 8 USC 1611. "Illegal alien" is also found in other statutes, like 6 USC 240, 13 USC 141, and 18 USC App. 1201 to 1203. That's at least 5 federal statutes, not to mention state laws as well. She also must have missed its use in Supreme Court rulings, such as Arizona v. United States (2012). 

Update:  In response to being called out for misleading the public in its story about the use of the term illegal alien, the Chicago Tribune prominently reposted the story as reported here.

Armed Gardeners?

| No Comments
We've all heard of armed guards, but armed gardeners? Wes Venteicher reports for the SacBee:

Capitol groundskeepers who have been attacked by homeless people recently may carry pepper spray, but the state won't yet pay for it, according to a letter the California Department of General Services sent to the workers' union.

News Scan

| No Comments
Worst Serial Killer:  An article by NBCNews, reports that the FBI has confirmed the confession of the reputed worst serial killer in U.S. history.  The agency has verified at least 50 victims murdered by Samuel Little, surpassing the body count of the Green River Killer, Ted Bundy, and John Wayne Gacy.  While serving three life terms in a California prison for three murders, Little admitted to killing 90 other women.  According to a supporting article, he confessed to the additional killings when he was requesting to be transferred to a different prison. These crimes all took place from the years 1970-2005 and they were spread out across the country. Little was able to get away with his killings for so long because he was constantly moving from state to state and targeting sex workers or drug addicts, women who could easily disappear without a trace. Christie Palazzolo, an analyst for the FBI's violent crime Apprehension Program, states that "Even though he is already in prison, the FBI believes it is important to seek justice for each victim- to close every case possible". Due to his health and current age of 79 years old, Samuel Little will most likely spend the rest of his life in prison, the FBI is currently still trying to find out if he was possibly connected even to more murders.  

News Scan

| 1 Comment
Malvo Case Focuses on Juvenile LWOP:  The U.S. Supreme Court's hearing in Mathena v. Malvo, scheduled for Wednesday, October 16, has intensified the debate between those who want to end life without parole (LWOP) sentencing of murderers under 18, and prosecutors and victims groups who maintain that LWOP is appropriate in some cases.  R.J. Vogt of Law 360 reports that  the court will be deciding if its earlier rulings in Miller v. Alabama and Montgomery v. Louisiana, which placed limits on LWOP sentences for under 18 murderers, should be expanded to partially or completely eliminate the sentence, or should be narrowly construed.  Malvo was 17 in 2002 when he and John Allen Mohammad carried out a 20-day spree of random sniper attacks in the DC area,  murdering 10 people and injuring 3 others.  Since Miller and Montgomery were handed down, 23 states have abolished LWOP for juvenile murderers while 22 others have kept it.  Proponents of abolishment argue that the brains of 17 year-olds are undeveloped and often unable to control behavior.  An attorney representing another juvenile murderer told reporters, "it serves no purpose to condemn him to die in prison for his actions as a child."  But the families of those murdered by these "children" feel differently.  "Many victims would like to see Malvo in prison for the rest of his life," said CJLF Attorney Kymberlee Stapleton, who authored the Foundation's brief in the case.  Another victim's advocate put it this way:  "There are some people who are damaged and completely unable to be safe among society."  While this case is under review, abolitionists are seeking state legislation to reduce LWOP sentences for murderers up to age 25.           
The U.S. Supreme Court opens its new term on Monday.  This morning it released a short list of five cases in which it granted review.  That list can be found here.  Of the five cases, only one is criminal.  

In United States v. Sineneng-Smith, No.19-67, the justices agreed to review a Ninth Circuit decision that struck down as unconstitutional a federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (B)(i)) that makes it a crime to encourage or induce illegal immigration for financial gain.

On Monday the Court will release a much longer list of cases it reviewed at the long conference that was held earlier this week.


The Court House News Service recently released a story on Death Row inmates in Arizona along with the state's office of the federal public defender stating that they are suing the U.S. Department of Justice because they believe that they are not receiving proper post-conviction representation and that the DOJ's process for certifying a state representation system is inadequate. The lawsuit specifically attacks the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1966, alleging that "the U.S. attorney general has far too much discretion" under the law as amended in 2006. "Once the Justice Department approves the states' processes" for appointing counsel for state post-conviction review of capital cases, "the timeline for habeas corpus proceedings is shortened and judicial review of state judgments is curtailed ...."

The inmates filed a 37-page complaint highlighting that DOJ's implementing regulation impose restrictions on timelines for filings, along with other complaints supporting their argument. The Arizona Attorney General's application for certification of that State's process is three pages, "stating the process there is adequate, despite numerous public comments decrying the process, including from the plaintiffs". They complain that the rules put the burden on the defendants to prove that system is insufficient rather than on the state to prove it is sufficient.

Not mentioned in the article is the fact that the Ninth Circuit decided in 2016 that (1) defense organizations do not have standing to challenge the regulations; and (2) a challenge by death-row inmates is not "ripe" for review until DOJ has actually applied the regulations in making a certification decision. See Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 816 F.3d 1241, 1244 (2016), cert. denied 197 L.Ed.2d 519 (2017). This ruling is binding precedent in the Arizona District Court. CJLF's amicus brief in that case is here.

Preview of SCOTUS Criminal Cases

| No Comments
Jordan Rubin has this preview of the criminal cases in the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court for Bloomberg Law.

News Scan

| No Comments
Killer Juul: An article by CNBC reports that the Federal Prosecutors in California are issuing a criminal investigation against Juul, a high selling vaping company. Juul is a company that heavily advertises to teenagers and it is now coming into light as the death toll for Juul related illness rises. Statistics in this article indicate that "in 2016, more than 2 million U.S. middle school and high school students used e-cigarettes over a 30 day period", this is incredibly harmful to young children because it may stunt their brain development. This issue requires immediate attention because there is no way of knowing exactly what is in these Juul products that are causing lung illness and resulting in death. In a supporting article by CNBC, Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA center for tobacco products states, "there's no one compound, ingredient, constituent, including vitamin E acetate that is showing up in all of the samples" with this statement it is safe to say that all Juul products should be avoided until further information is released on what these products contain.

Oklahoma Court Upholds Death Sentence:  The Associated Press reports that Oklahoma's highest criminal court upheld the death sentence of Donnie Harris, who murdered his estranged girlfriend in 2012.  The Court's unanimous decision indicated that Harris and 25-year-old Kristi Ferguson had been in a tumultuous relationship when, late on February 18, 2012, the residents of a neighbor's home heard screaming on their front porch.  They found Ferguson nearly naked with severe burns over her body screaming in pain and Harris telling her to shut up.  First responders testified that Harris tried to keep Ferguson from telling them what happened, but she managed to say, "He did this to me. ... He threw kerosene on me and set me on fire."  Ferguson died 19 days later from second and third degree burns over 50% of her body.  Doctors testified that the pain associated with Ferguson's injuries would have been unimaginable.  Overwhelming evidence convinced the jury to find Harris guilty of pouring gasoline over the girl's body and setting her on fire, and unanimously recommend a death sentence.  Harris argued that he had not received a fair trial.   

Briefs in Boise Homeless Camping Case

| 2 Comments
The fight over Boise's anti-camping ordinance as applied to homeless persons is now before the Supreme Court as City of Boise v. Martin, No. 19-247. Prior posts on this case are here and here. The case is in the "petition stage," meaning that Boise has requested that the high court accept the case for full briefing and argument, but that request has not yet been acted upon.

Twenty friend-of-the-court briefs have been filed, including one by CJLF. As a public service, we have compiled the summaries of argument of the briefs and consolidated them into a single document.

The amici are a diverse group. Boise is supported not only by law enforcement groups and conservative organizations and government entities but also by organizations serving the homeless and by localities with quite left-of-center governing bodies, including the City of Los Angeles.

The respondents' brief in opposition to the petition is due October 25.

An Easy End for Russell Bucklew

| 2 Comments
Today's News Scan notes that Russell Bucklew was executed in Missouri yesterday. This well-deserved execution was delayed for an additional 13 years after the extended review of the judgment because of litigation over the method of execution. Bucklew's final claim was that his unusual medical condition created a risk of severe pain in a type of execution that is nearly painless for everyone else. This claim went to the Supreme Court, which rejected it by a 5-4 vote.

Alisa Nelson reports on the execution for Missourinet. The story says, "a Missourinet reporter served as a state witness of the execution." It does not say Ms. Nelson was the witness, but it reads like a first-hand account.

A line of curtains swung open in a dark room of state witnesses. Bucklew was in a room next door positioned on a gurney with a sheet over all but his head. He did not appear to say anything as the drug began working its way through his system. A few wiggles of the toes and a couple turns of the head was it, no choking or other sounds were heard or seen.
*      *      *

News Scan

| No Comments
Missouri Executes First Murderer Since 2017:  A Missouri man convicted of aggravated murder during a 1996 crime spree died peacefully Tuesday from a massive lethal injection of pentobarbital.  The Associated Press reports that Russell Bucklew had won stays of execution twice based on concerns that a medical condition he suffered from would cause his execution to be painful.  On Valentine's Day in 1996, Bucklew's girlfriend broke up with him.  Over the next few weeks Bucklew stalked her and attacked her physically, punching her in the face and cutting her with a knife. Fearing for her life and the lives of her children, she moved into the home of her new boyfriend. On March 21, Bucklew stole a car, armed himself and followed her to the boyfriend's house.  Once there, he shot and killed the boyfriend, pistol whipped and raped his ex-girlfriend, then led police on a chase that concluded with a gunfight that wounded two officers.  Bucklew later escaped from the county jail and attacked his ex-girlfriend's mother with a hammer before being rearrested.  The prosecutor who convicted Bucklew told reporters, "He is probably the most pure sociopath I ever prosecuted."  
The FBI published its annual crime statistics, Crime in the United States 2018, today. The violent crime rate dropped 3.6%, not quite back to the 2014 low, but getting there. The property crime rate continued its steady decline, dropping 6.9%. "Rate," for both figures, means number of crimes per 100,000 population, as distinguished from the raw count of crimes.

Also continuing the trend, California did not fully share in the drop, as it has not since it began its mass decarceration project in 2011. The drops in California rates were 1.3% for violent and 5% for property.

News Scan

| No Comments
CA Effort to Curb Prison Violence Halted:  An effort initiated over a year ago by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to reduce gang violence in state prisons by encouraging gangs to co-exist has been discontinued.  Don Thompson of the Associated Press reports that when prison officials allowed members of different gangs to share exercise yards, fights broke out almost immediately.  At the state prison in Fresno, officials tried 45 times to put members of different gangs in the same yard resulting with violence erupting 27 times and 3 full scale riots occurring.  A spokesperson for CDCR told reporters "I don't know why they fight.  We just expect our people to engage in positive behavior, engage in positive programs."  This level of naivety by those actually supervising criminals in prison is remarkable. 

Courts Divided on Prosecuting Violent Juveniles as Adults:  The validity of SB 1391, A California law which bars the prosecution of violent juveniles in adult court, will likely be determined by the state supreme court.  Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle reports that a decision Monday by the state's Second District Court of Appeal, held that the statute was in conflict with Proposition 57, a ballot measure adopted by voters in 2016.  The initiative provides that the legislature could only amend it if the changes furthered its intent.  Earlier this year the state's First District Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld AB 1391, ruling that it did further the intent of Proposition 57.  The decision by the Second District held differently, finding that the initiative permitted prosecutors to try violent juveniles in adult court while the legislation precludes this. Part of the problem is how the initiative is interpreted.  The Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016 was promoted by Governor Jerry Brown as a law that would keep violent criminals in prison while allowing release to rehabilitation programs for non-violent offenders.  District Attorneys opposed the Act because it allowed criminals with violent priors like rape and murder to gain release if their most recent crime was a property or drug offense.  Under Proposition 57 a prosecutor could petition a juvenile court judge to authorize a violent juvenile offender to be tried in adult court.  AB 1391 prohibits this allowing juveniles, including those who convicted of multiple murders, to be released from prison at age 25.         

Monthly Archives