Recently in Blog Category

Test Post

| No Comments
If this had been an actual post, it would have said something important.

A New, Top-Notch Legal Blog

| No Comments
We all know that Crime and Consequences is the No. 1 source for a conservative perspective on criminal law issues.  Kent by himself stands head and shoulders above the analytical ability of the huge majority of lawyers (and judges, for that matter).  It is no exaggeration to say that I have never met a more insightful or fair-minded advocate.

Today, I want to introduce a new entrant in the blogging world, the FedSoc Blog. Like the Volokh Conspiracy, it touches on all aspects of the law, including, from time-to-time, criminal law questions.

The quality of the bloggers boggles the mind; some of the best legal thinkers in America are among them.  They include, for example, Prof. Richard Epstein of New York University (and the Hoover Institution); Prof. Akhil Amar of Yale; former Attorney General Michael Mukasey; and (to have viewpoint diversity) Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California Irvine School of Law.

To keep things from getting too stratospheric, however, I also occasionally put up a post. I have just recently, repeating my discussion on C&C of what I view as the most important reasons to oppose the current versions of sentencing reform.

A Comment on Comments

I tend to be responsive to comments  --  more responsive than any other blogger I'm aware of writing on criminal law issues.  I do this principally to stimulate debate on questions I view as important.  

Of late, however, I find that my degree of responsiveness has developed some problems. It seems sometimes to have spawned baiting, filibustering and diversion, to the detriment of authentic debate.  It has also produced long threads of declining interest and attenuated relevance to the main entry. This is going to be curbed.
CJLF owns this blog and has its own comment policy.  In addition, in the future, I will be inclined to ignore comments not in keeping with a dozen common sense guideposts. 

Registering to Comment

| No Comments
We received an email inquiry from someone wanting to register to comment but unable to do so.  Since others may have the same question, I decided to make the answer a post.

When the blog started, would-be commenters could register on the blog and get a user ID and a password.  Upon one of the periodic updates of the blog software, I was horrified to discover that some genius at Movable Type (the software maker) had decided that self-registerers would be designated "authors" rather than "commenters" by default, meaning they could write posts as well as comment on them.  As that was unacceptable, I had to shut the feature off.  Legacy commenters can still use their IDs, but nobody can register on their own.

To compensate, I opened commenting to people who sign in through other services, including OpenID, Google, and Yahoo.  At the "sign in" page, there is a drop-down menu to choose one of these other sign-in methods.

Some of these other sign-in methods have an annoying "feature" (or bug, IMHO) of using a long string of random characters for a user name.  For those signing in this way, we request that you adopt a "handle" and "sign" your comments in the text so everyone can see which comments come from the same person.

At some point in the not too distant future, hopefully, I will be able to restore the original registration system, and then I will phase out use of the alternative services.  But I am employed mainly as a lawyer here.  Being the IT Guy is "additional duty" that I do when I get around to it.  So I don't know when that will be.  In the meantime, we appreciate your patience.

Off for a Few Days

I will be posting few if any entries or responses for the next three days or so, as my wife and I pack up our winter home, take a long flight to the mainland, and prepare to re-open our home in the DC suburbs.  With Kent in charge, as ever, I think the blog will do just fine.

Newspaper Paywalls

| No Comments
On this blog, we link a lot to newspaper stories.  Alas, the golden age of free access to newspapers via the internet is drawing to a close.  One by one, the newspapers are putting their content behind paywalls.

Banned in Lexington

It seems that the Commonwealth's Attorney in Fayette County, Kentucky, Ray Larson, has taken some heat for posting some of our stuff and has taken the repost down.
Some readers have told me by email that they tried to register at ABA Journal to vote for their favorite blog (which I hope and presume was this one) but were told that their registration was suspected spam and was discarded.  After several email exchanges with the editors, that problem appears to be fixed.

So here is the link again.  Of course I wouldn't be so crass as to ask you to ... sure I would!  Vote for C&C!

ABA Journal Blawg 100

| No Comments
The ABA Journal has its annual list of the 100 best law blogs.  You can register and vote for your favorites.


| No Comments
The blog may be unavailable or unresponsive at times late at night and early in the morning this week, as our host does system maintenance.  Outages are not expected to last more than 45 minutes.  Potentially affected hours are midnight - 5 a.m. EST (9 p.m. - 2 a.m. PST).

Joshua Crawford blogging at C&C

| No Comments
We welcome to the blog Joshua Crawford, third-year law student at Suffolk University, who is interning at CJLF this summer. His first post is here.

Congratulations to C&C

| No Comments
I never know how much stock to put in surveys like this, but this one has C&C as the top-rated pro-prosecution blog.

No fair saying that, since the profession is dominated by defense lawyers, there's not much competition.  I have been shocked by the number and the high station of people who tell me they read C&C.

Congratulations to Mike Rushford and Kent, whose analytical abilities and fair-mindedness equal the best you see in Supreme Court practice.

Comment on Comments, Restated

| No Comments
Checking back, it seems it's been over two years since we stated our policies on comments.  They are, for the most part, listed in this post from September 2011 and have mostly not changed.

I have backed off a bit on "trusting" commenters who sign in with methods that do not provide a recognizable user name.  We do prefer that such commenters "sign" their comments in the text with a recognizable handle.

One thing I did not mention in that post, which should be too obvious to need mention, is that we don't appreciate profanity here and reserve the discretion to not publish or to delete comments containing it.  That is not to say there are "forbidden words" that can never be used in any context.  Sometimes it is appropriate, perhaps quoting the perpetrator while discussing a crime.  Hopefully everyone commenting here has enough sense to distinguish those rare and limited exceptions from the general rule that you don't use profanity in a public forum.

Under Construction

| No Comments
We are doing some upgrades to the blog.  There may be a few glitches along the way.

ABA Journal Blawg 100

| No Comments
The ABAJ is out with its annual law-blog ("blawg") list, and we are pleased to see that C&C is on it again.  This year, our blog blurb is a quote from a C&C reader:

"For a prosecutor or anyone else who believes that people are responsible for their own actions and that justice for victims is at least as important as mercy for criminals, this blog serves up the good news." --Dennis J. Skayhan, Berks County (Pa.) District Attorney's Office
Thanks, Mr. Skayhan.  Glad you like it.

As usual, readers can vote for their favorite blog by category.  (Registration is required and has to be renewed annually.  But it's free and easy.)  There are seven criminal law blogs, of which five are defense-oriented.

Monthly Archives