Recently in Off Topic Category

Simian Selfie Update

| 1 Comment
Totally off-topic.

Thank God for Editing

| No Comments
I often find the book reviews in the WSJ to be entertaining reading over Saturday breakfast, even when I have no intention of ever reading the books reviewed.

A Belated Royal Funeral

| No Comments
Karla Adam has this story in the WaPo, giving us another segment of the story that won't die, though its subject did over five centuries ago.

Pi Day

An off-topic note for math geeks.

Florida Takes the Number 3 Slot

| No Comments
Valerie Bauerlein reports in the WSJ, "Florida overtook New York as the third most populous state last year, according to data released Tuesday by the U.S. Census Bureau, as the Sunshine State continued to pick up postrecession steam."
Maria Cheng reports for AP:

Scientists say there is "overwhelming evidence" that a skeleton found under a parking lot is that of England's King Richard III, but their DNA testing also has raised questions about the nobility of some of his royal successors.
For prior posts on this blog enter "Richard III" in the search field at the upper right.
Off-topic but interesting, Fergus Bordewich in the WSJ takes us on a historical trip down the "what if" road.

Simian Selfie Follow-Up

| No Comments
MONKEY-SELF-PORTRAIT.jpg Off-topic but hilarious, David Post at the Volokh Conspiracy has a follow-up on the copyright dispute over this selfie, previously noted on this blog three years ago.

Update:  Abby Phillip has this story in the WaPo.
Fifty years ago today, President Johnson signed the most important legislation of modern American history, the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Man Up?

Secretary of State John Kerry has raised eyebrows with his statement regarding Edward Snowden: "The bottom line is this man has betrayed his country, sitting in Russia where he has taken refuge. You know, he should man up and come back to the United States."  Alexandra Petri has this lighthearted look at the WaPo.

How to Win a Case in One Line

| 1 Comment
This is not a criminal case, but it's an example like few I have seen of how to write an appellate opinion.  The author here is Judge Ray Kethledge of the Sixth Circuit.  I've known Judge  Kethledge for years, and starting in August, one of my students from two years ago will be clerking for him.  The opinion, handed down today, is in this employment discrimination case.  Judge Kethledge's first line is:

"In this case the EEOC sued the defendants for using the same type of background check that the EEOC itself uses."

For the EEOC, it was downhill from there.

National Punctuation Day

| No Comments
That is today, according to this website.  "A celebration of the lowly comma, correctly used quotation marks, and other proper uses of periods, semicolons, and the ever-mysterious ellipsis."  Let's not forget the apostrophe, easily the most misused punctuation mark in the land.

Gettysburg Sesquicentennial

| No Comments
This week is the sesquicentennial of the Battle of Gettysburg, one of the pivotal events of American history.  George Will has this column at the WaPo.  Historian Allen Guelzo has this article at the WSJ.

Things You Don't Need To Worry About

| No Comments
As Kent has noted, CJLF takes no position on DOMA.  Although some readers might be quite concerned, in one way or the other, about how the DOMA case will turn out, there are other issues involving sex that, I am happy to report, probably will not pose immediate problems on the legal front, or any others  --  unless you and your significant other are planning a trip to the moon.

First Person Language

Blogger Neuroskeptic offers his thoughts on an editorial by Roger Collier in the Canadian Medical Association Journal about the use of politically correct language in formal writing.  Some excerpts: 

There's a reason Ernest Hemingway didn't call his novel The Person Who Was Male and Advanced in Years and the Sea. He valued economy of language over verbosity, so "Old Man" worked fine to describe his titular character. One can only imagine what Papa Hemingway would think of person-first language.

Of course, the purpose of person-first language -- such as "person with a disability" instead of "disabled person" -- isn't to produce writing that is more concise, clear or lyrical. It's supposed to promote the idea that personhood is not defined by disability or disease.


"Whatever is negative or taboo, such as disease or illness, we try to avoid talking about it," says Halmari. "It's a fallen world, and we need to talk about unpleasant and sad things."

The structure of person-first language also does a poor job of de-emphasizing disability, notes Halmari. In English, emphasis naturally occurs at the end of sentences. This is why, when asked if there are rules for humour writing, Washington Post columnist Gene Weingarten replied: "Only one. I always try to put the funniest word at the end of the sentence underpants."

As a Gen X'er myself, I'm somewhat accustom to the revised model of describing people with disabilities.  I also sympathize with those who prefer the terminology of "a person with schizophrenia" rather than a "schizophrenic" because it signifies that schizophrenia is not the whole description of that person.  But I also realize that writing that way really does change how we think about people, behavior and responsibility.  People are not criminals but "people with criminal justice histories" and murderers are instead people convicted of murder.  Some may say it is humanizes but it also obfuscates.

I'm reminded of the late comedian George Carlin who once said poor people are not folks with a negative cash-flow position.  No, they're just plain broke.     

Monthly Archives