The politics of political correctness will probably prevail, as family members of the victims of the 2004 terrorist attack on a Russian school which resulted in the deaths of 340, mostly children, insist that, if found guilty, the only surviving terrorist receive the death penalty. Russia is a member of the Council of Europe, and the only member which had not formally abolished the death penalty, although it has maintained a morotorium on executions for ten years. Read the story from Moscownews.com here
<< Hawaii gets a Three Strikes law | Main | Should the U.S. Supreme Court be guided by foreign precedent? >>
Russians question European ban on death penalty
Categories:
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Search
Recent Entries
- News Scan
- Unexplained Orders
- Shocking Innocence Report: Government Killed Thousands
- Monica Still Yacking, WaPo Still Spinning
- Scratch One From the AG Short List
- News Scan
- FedSoc Event on Prop. 47
- More on the Gallup Death Penalty Poll
- Debating the Death Penalty
- Justice and morality, not utility, are main reasons for death penalty positions on both sides
Monthly Archives
- October 2014 (79)
- September 2014 (85)
- August 2014 (92)
- July 2014 (81)
- June 2014 (73)
- May 2014 (104)
- April 2014 (96)
- March 2014 (62)
- February 2014 (70)
- January 2014 (66)
- December 2013 (57)
- November 2013 (68)
- October 2013 (67)
- September 2013 (57)
- August 2013 (90)
- July 2013 (54)
- June 2013 (65)
- May 2013 (103)
- April 2013 (135)
- March 2013 (84)
- February 2013 (79)
- January 2013 (81)
- December 2012 (96)
- November 2012 (65)
- October 2012 (110)
- September 2012 (74)
- August 2012 (95)
- July 2012 (70)
- June 2012 (80)
- May 2012 (86)
- April 2012 (84)
- March 2012 (78)
- February 2012 (58)
- January 2012 (63)
- December 2011 (42)
- November 2011 (73)
- October 2011 (108)
- September 2011 (98)
- August 2011 (95)
- July 2011 (84)
- June 2011 (90)
- May 2011 (125)
- April 2011 (90)
- March 2011 (123)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (102)
- December 2010 (106)
- November 2010 (88)
- October 2010 (102)
- September 2010 (107)
- August 2010 (83)
- July 2010 (78)
- June 2010 (96)
- May 2010 (102)
- April 2010 (108)
- March 2010 (105)
- February 2010 (100)
- January 2010 (113)
- December 2009 (58)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (89)
- September 2009 (85)
- August 2009 (62)
- July 2009 (61)
- June 2009 (72)
- May 2009 (65)
- April 2009 (60)
- March 2009 (90)
- February 2009 (56)
- January 2009 (57)
- December 2008 (71)
- November 2008 (62)
- October 2008 (74)
- September 2008 (52)
- August 2008 (33)
- July 2008 (56)
- June 2008 (71)
- May 2008 (54)
- April 2008 (83)
- March 2008 (51)
- February 2008 (40)
- January 2008 (40)
- December 2007 (34)
- November 2007 (41)
- October 2007 (45)
- September 2007 (47)
- August 2007 (42)
- July 2007 (49)
- June 2007 (61)
- May 2007 (55)
- April 2007 (55)
- March 2007 (55)
- February 2007 (57)
- January 2007 (51)
- December 2006 (30)
- November 2006 (46)
- October 2006 (52)
- September 2006 (30)
- August 2006 (44)
- July 2006 (34)
- June 2006 (26)
- May 2006 (14)
- April 2006 (1)
About C & C Blog
About CJLF
Issues
- Academia (36)
- Blog (13)
- Cases (118)
- Civil Suits (28)
- Clemency (19)
- Constitution (46)
- Counsel (114)
- Criminal Procedure (148)
- Death Penalty (1418)
- Drugs (116)
- Evidence (196)
- Federal Courts (98)
- Federalism (15)
- Firearms (19)
- First Amendment (52)
- General (818)
- Habeas Corpus (395)
- Humor (78)
- International (112)
- Judicial Selection (62)
- Jury Trial (1)
- Juveniles (87)
- Mental State (229)
- News Scan (1863)
- Notorious Cases (274)
- Off Topic (32)
- Policing (18)
- Politics (240)
- Polls (37)
- Prisons (223)
- Probation and Parole (26)
- Public Order (40)
- Rehabilitation (22)
- Search and Seizure (157)
- Self-defense (9)
- Sentencing (451)
- Sex offenses (29)
- Social Factors (80)
- State Courts (48)
- Studies (266)
- Stupid Crooks (1)
- Terrorism (219)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1215)
- Use of Force (26)
- Victims' Rights (36)
Links
Criminal Justice Legal Fdn.
U.S. Supreme Court
Bureau of Justice Statistics
Californians for Death Penalty Reform & Savings
U.S. Supreme Court
Bureau of Justice Statistics
Californians for Death Penalty Reform & Savings
Blogs
SCOTUSblog
Bench Memos (NRO)
The Volokh Conspiracy
Sentencing Law & Policy
How Appealing
The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes
Homicide Survivors
FedSoc Blog
The Cert Pool
Blog of Legal Times
Bench Memos (NRO)
The Volokh Conspiracy
Sentencing Law & Policy
How Appealing
The BLT: The Blog of LegalTimes
Homicide Survivors
FedSoc Blog
The Cert Pool
Blog of Legal Times
Meanwhile in the Western Hemisphere, there is renewed support for capital punishment in the Carribbean islands. As Associate Justice Breyer has repeatedly noted, the Privy Council held in a Jamaican case that delay in execution constituted a type of cruel and unusual punishment. Now, Barbados is seeking to overturn that decision in a local court that was created to offsent the anti-death penalty bias of the British Privy Council. Once again, this calls into question the reliance on any so-called international consensus about capital punishment. The AP Article follows.
Ward
PORT OF SPAIN, Trinidad (AP) - The Caribbean Court of Justice will consider an appeal by Barbados to overturn a long-standing legal precedent that has blocked executions across the region during a period of rising crime and renewed calls for the death penalty.
On Tuesday, Barbados will ask the CCJ, a regional appeals court that heard its first case last year, to allow it to hang two men convicted of beating another man to death in 1999 - overturning a ruling that executions must occur within five years of conviction.
"This could affect death penalty cases across the Caribbean," said Ramesh Deosaran, director of the Centre for Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of the West Indies in Trinidad.
The region's last hanging - the method of executions in the Caribbean - was in the Bahamas in 2000.
In 1999, Trinidad hanged 10 men in one year; Jamaica's last hanging was in 1988.
Jamaica's membership in the CCJ has been blocked by a constitutional challenge.
The Caribbean court was started to counter the power of Britain's Privy Council, which used to be the final appeals court for the English-speaking Caribbean and was viewed as anti-death penalty by leaders in the region. The council also was seen as a remaining vestige of colonial power.
Many Caribbean countries have experienced surging crime rates, hampering their abilities to tout their islands as idyllic paradises to tourists. The death penalty has strong support in several of the countries as a way to clamp down on violence.
In Pratt and Morgan, the 1993 case that Barbados wants to overturn, the Privy Council ruled that keeping a prisoner on death row for more than five years was cruel and inhumane.
Lawyers for Barbados have argued that the time limit is an arbitrary restriction preventing them from upholding justice.
If the new court strikes down the Privy Council's ruling, it won't mean an automatic return to executions across the Caribbean since only two of the fifteen countries that voted to start the court - Barbados and Guyana - have passed legislation to accept its jurisdiction.
But it could prompt other nations to join the court and eventually lead to the resumption of executions, Deosaran said.
Though the court's judges are aware of the political pressures to hang convicted killers, it's unlikely that they will throw out such established case law.
"This is their first death penalty case," said Gregory Delzin, an anti-death penalty advocate in the Caribbean. "They're not going to come out of the barn with their guns blazing."