September 2019 Archives
John F. Pfaff's Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration and How to Achieve Real Reform is probably the best book on so-called mass incarceration to date. Its great strength is that it is empirically grounded. Pfaff, a professor of law at Fordham, doesn't cherry-pick data to support some a priori theory, he grapples with the hard realities that the data present. As he well understands, this makes his argument for reducing imprisonment a very tough sell.
After all, if violent crime and other serious offenses are the primary reasons for incarceration then why should we reduce imprisonment? And if we still wish to disincarcerate, despite the compelling reasons for all the lockups, then how might this be achieved? Unfortunately, Pfaff's answers to these questions are the least persuasive portions of his book.
More than three-quarters of people who have developed severe lung illness after vaping reported using THC-containing products, a new report found, as officials continue to piece together a picture of the mysterious disease.
The maxim "if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth"* often serves our opponents well. In the case of the Big Lie about the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, though, it may be unraveling. Candidates' lies about that incident are so clearly contrary to the now-well-known facts that even left-leaning media are calling them out on it. William Saletan reports for Slate:
Last week, in a Democratic presidential debate, former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro read a list of black Americans killed by police violence. Alongside Laquan McDonald, Walter Scott, and Eric Garner, Castro named Michael Brown, who was shot dead five years ago in Ferguson, Missouri. Several of the current Democratic candidates have accused the officer who shot Brown of murder. Brown's death was a tragedy, but it wasn't a murder. When Democrats claim it was, and when they refuse to correct that mistake, they cast doubt on their commitment to truth. And they undermine the cause of criminal justice reform.
Former Massachusetts Governor and Republican presidential challenger Bill Weld said Monday that President Donald Trump's "acts of treason" in pressuring Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden deserved the death penalty.
"That is treason. It's treason pure and simple, and the penalty for treason under the U.S. code is death," Weld told MSNBC's Morning Joe. "That's the only penalty."
In a couple of weeks, the Supreme Court will hear arguments
in the case of Kahler v. Kansas. The
central question is whether there is a federal constitutional right to the insanity
defense. It is my view that the Court
should find such a right and I would like to explain why.
The cornerstone of our criminal justice system is responsibility. We presume that people are responsible for their conduct and should be punished when they violate the law. Punishment and social condemnation are reserved for the criminal justice system. A system of crime control without blame and punishment is merely a civil system of behavioral management (which we now see with the various civil sex offender statutes).
For someone to be responsible, he must be a rational agent. To be rational is to have reasons based on accurate perceptions and the ability to form sound judgments. Only humans are capable of being guided by reasons, and the law presumes that people can and should be judged by their reasons. The capacity for rationality is a necessity for legal and moral responsibility, which is why young children and those with profound intellectual disabilities have long been considered not responsible for their conduct.
Some people believe that kids who engage in school shootings
are often under the influence of psychiatric medications and that this drives
their behavior. A new study sheds some light onto that theory finding about
half of the school shooters had been prescribed these medicines before their
crimes. The authors' conclusion is that is insignificant to suggest a causal
link. Perhaps so.
What is unsurprising is that so many of these kids had received mental health treatment before their crimes. These are deeply troubled individuals. We should also not be surprised that the mental health professionals did not foresee the risk of violence that these kids posed to their communities. Many kids get mental health treatment and do not engage in mass shootings. Red flag laws may have their place but it is important to keep in mind that separating the the typical patient from the dangerous one is tricky business.
Application (19A230) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to JUSTICE KAGAN and by her referred to the Court is granted. The district court's July 24, 2019 order granting a preliminary injunction and September 9, 2019 order restoring the nationwide scope of the injunction are stayed in full pending disposition of the Government's appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government's petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE GINSBURG joins, dissenting from grant of stay.