Results matching “first”

Death Penalty Fast Track?

Attorney General William Barr addressed the Fraternal Order of Police today. His remarks as prepared are available on the USDOJ website. There are several gold nuggets in this speech. For this post, I will quote just one paragraph:

This Administration will not tolerate violence against police, and we will do all we can to protect the safety of law enforcement officers.  I will share with you one proposal that we will be advancing after Labor Day.  We will be proposing legislation providing that in cases of mass murder, or in cases of murder of a law enforcement officer, there will be a timetable for judicial proceedings that will allow imposition of any death sentence without undue delay.  Punishment must be swift and certain.

I am elated that speeding up the needlessly and grotesquely protracted proceedings in capital cases is getting the personal attention of the Attorney General. However, the chances of getting death penalty fast track legislation through Nancy Pelosi's House of Representatives are essentially nil, so why don't we see what we can do with existing law?

News Scan

59 Shot in Chicago Last Weekend:  The first weekend in August was the most violent of the year in Chicago with seven people killed and 52 wounded in the city's west-side neighborhoods.  Julie Bosman of the New York Times reports that the recent violence brings total murders in the city to at least 300, with 1,600 shootings this year.  Chicago police have been criticizing Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx for the light sentences and release on bond given to gun offenders.  As reported by the Daily Wire, Fox ran as a progressive in 2016, promising to reign in police and reduce incarceration.  She received $300,000 in campaign contributions from ultra-liberal billionaire George Soros and another $75,000 from Soros to her PAC for her next election. 

News Scan

Bill Introduced to Abolish the Death Penalty:  Senate Judiciary Committee members joined by four Democrat presidential candidates have have proposed legislation to abolish the federal death penalty.  Janta Kan of the Epoch Times reports that Senator Cory Booker, who is running for president, was joined by Judiciary Committee members Patrick Leahy and Dick Durbin in an announcement Wednesday that the legislation would prohibit the execution of those convicted in federal court of aggravated first degree murder.  Co-sponsors of the bill include presidential candidates Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders and Amy Klobuchar.  The bill is in response to Attorney General William Barr's recent announcement to move forward with the executions of five federal murderers who have exhausted their appeals.  Among the killers the bill's sponsors want to spare is Wesley Ira Purkey, sentenced to death for the violent rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl, whose body he dismembered, burned, and dumped in a septic pond. He also was convicted in state court for using a claw hammer to bludgeon to death an 80-year-old woman who suffered from polio and walked with a cane.  CJLF Legal Director Kent Scheidegger said that the bill will go nowhere, citing polls indicating that most Americans do not want to abolish capital punishment.  The odds are zero that the Senate bill or the companion bill in the House will pass in either chamber.    
NYLS Prof. Robert Blecker has this op-ed at Fox News with the above title.

Attorney General William Barr should be applauded for announcing Thursday that the federal government will resume executing convicted murderers on death row for the first time since 2003, beginning with five vicious killers in December and January.
*      *      *
While the legislation Barr refers to permits a punishment of death, it doesn't compel it. We rely on the Justice Department to seek the death penalty only for the worst of the worst murderers - those who most clearly deserve to die. And we rely on juries in each individual murder case to act as the moral filter and conscience of the community to decide if the death penalty is warranted.

Reviewing the despicable crimes of the five men scheduled to be executed, we can safely say that the Justice Department has exercised its prerogative wisely.
USDOJ issued this press release today.

Attorney General William P. Barr has directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to adopt a proposed Addendum to the Federal Execution Protocol--clearing the way for the federal government to resume capital punishment after a nearly two decade lapse, and bringing justice to victims of the most horrific crimes.  The Attorney General has further directed the Acting Director of the BOP, Hugh Hurwitz, to schedule the executions of five death-row inmates convicted of murdering, and in some cases torturing and raping, the most vulnerable in our society--children and the elderly.
*     *     *
The Federal Execution Protocol Addendum, which closely mirrors protocols utilized by several states, including currently Georgia, Missouri, and Texas, replaces the three-drug procedure previously used in federal executions with a single drug--pentobarbital.  Since 2010, 14 states have used pentobarbital in over 200 executions, and federal courts, including the Supreme Court, have repeatedly upheld the use of pentobarbital in executions as consistent with the Eighth Amendment.

Does the federal government have a source of pentobarbital? Apparently so. It should order a big batch and share it with the states, eliminating the problematic use of non-barbiturates in three-drug protocols.

Underwood Follow-Up

Here is a follow-up on my "poster boy" post of last week. Eugene Volokh has reprinted the post at his eponymous Conspiracy and added some additional investigation.

A reporter at NJ.com told Eugene that he just reported Senator Booker's statement. However, the first three paragraphs of the story simply report the supposed facts of Underwood's case with no quote marks and no mention of Senator Booker.

If the same reporter had received a press release from Senator Cotton, would he copy the facts stated there into his story with no checking, no quote marks, and no attribution? I seriously doubt it. That is a good example of the confirmation bias referred to in the original post.

News Scan

Anti-Sentencing Group Launched:  Another sentencing reform (read sentencing reduction) think tank announced its launch this week.  The Associated Press reports that the new Council on Criminal Justice will be headed by a bipartisan group of sentencing reformers including former California Governor Jerry Brown, Cal Supreme's Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, former Georgia Governor Nathan Deal, former Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, and Black Lives Matter organizer DeRay Mckesson among others.  The group is co-chaired by Koch industries Vice President  Marc Holden and Sally Yates, the Obama Deputy Attorney General fired for refusing to enforce President Trump's travel ban.  While there are some Republicans involved with this group, the suggestion that there is diversity of opinion is an illusion. No one associated with this group supports tough sentencing for repeat offenders.  Koch Industries is an advocate for reduced sentences and a big supporter of the First Step Act.  Jerry Brown's record is extreme on this issue.  The group, which will be well funded by liberal donors including the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation, and the Joyce Foundation, will join the Marshall Project, the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, the Sentencing Project and the ACLU and a dozen others to advocate for reduced consequences for criminals. 

Black Market Pot Flooding CA:  The State of California, where recreational marijuana became legal last year, is home to thousands of illegal pot shops and growers, which voters were told would die off if the drug were legalized and sales were regulated.  Patrick McGreevy of the Los Angeles Times reports that while law enforcement has seized roughly $30 million over the past year in illegal pot and hundreds of thousands in cash, the state is barely scratching the surface according to the California Cannabis Industry Association.  Research by New Frontier Data indicates that the black market for pot was worth $3.7 billion last year. In spite of this, the head of the Bureau of Cannabis Control thinks that her agency is doing "tremendous work" in regulating the sale of marijuana.  Governor Gavin Newsom is insisting that it will take several years for the state to take control of the market, but with pot use now legal, why would consumers pay high prices for the drug at a taxed and regulated pot shop, when they can get it much cheaper anywhere in the state on the black market.  The Associated Press reports that the promises made to voters about a windfall in tax revenues appear to have also been false.  The state has reduced its revenue projections twice in two years as it collected $288 million last year and estimates $359 million this year.  During the 2016 campaign advocates estimate $1 billion in annual tax revenues after legalization. 

3100 Federal Prisoners Released Today

Sadie Gurman has this article in the WSJ on a wave of prisoner releases today as a result of the First Step Act.

Federal sentencing law has long been more severe than most state laws, and some adjustments are in order. I was in favor of bringing down then-Senator Biden's absurd 100/1 crack/powder ratio for cocaine, for example.

Whether the First Step Act is successfully implemented to separate those who actually deserve earlier release from those who need to be kept locked up remains to be seen. The dismal drafting of the bill certainly is no guarantee. See this post and this letter.

With Bill Barr at the helm, we at least have a shot that this won't turn out to be a massive jailbreak. Of course, administrative implementation can be reversed by a subsequent administration, but the policies established at the threshold do have a tendency to get baked in, so there is some hope.

News Scan

MS13 Killers Charged in LA:  A federal grand jury indicted 22 members of the notorious MS 13 gang with murder last week.  CBS News reports that most of the members of the Fulton Clique chapter of the gang were teenagers who face charges of murdering seven people, some of whom were hacked to death with machetes.  Police report that MS 13 members are responsible for 24 murders in the Los Angeles area over the past two years.  While CBS somehow missed this, the LA Times reports that 19 of the 22 gang members were illegal aliens. 

Feds to Release 3,100 Inmates:  Sadie Gurnam of the Wall Street Journal reports that 3,100 federal criminals, most of which are categorized as non-violent drug offenders, will be released from prison today under the First Step Act.  Many were black offenders sentenced to lengthy terms on multiple counts of dealing crack cocaine.  The Justice Department has developed a risk assessment protocol to help determine which drug dealers will not endanger the public if released.   
Ann Coulter has this post on her website. She can be over the top at times, so I did some checking before posting on it myself. Ms. Coulter writes:

Over the weekend, NBC News investigative reporter Leigh Ann Caldwell appeared on MSNBC's "Kasie DC" to tell the story of Bill Underwood, loving parent and prison mentor, who has already spent nearly 30 years in prison for a nonviolent drug crime.
Ms. Caldwell reported:

"William Underwood, now 65 years old, was sentenced to life in prison without parole for a nonviolent drug-related crime. It was his first felony, but in the middle of the tough-on-crime era, the judge showed no leniency. With no hope of ever walking free again, Underwood has made the best of his time in prison, mentoring others and staying devoted to his children and grandchildren, as (his daughter) Ebony fights for his release."
The segment is here. That is indeed what Ms. Caldwell says. Is it true? Does she care if it's true?

News Scan

Gorsuch Seen as a Maverick:  In several cases over the just-ended Supreme Court term, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch has parted ways with conservatives to buttress the rights of individuals over government authority.  David Savage of the Los Angeles Times reports on how Gorsuch has strayed from the court's conservatives, mostly writing dissents, in cases including one involving an Alabama man who was prosecuted twice for carrying a gun in his car, and another involving two African American men from Texas who were sentenced to more than 50 years in prison for robbing gas stations. But the reporter also included Gundy v. United States, where Gorsuch wrote a 33-page dissent, joined by Thomas and Roberts arguing to rein in the administrative state.  While, on the surface, one might expect the conservatives to drop the hammer on a sex offender convicted of failing to register with the state of Maryland under a law adopted two years after his crime.  But it was the liberals, led by Justice Kagan and joined reluctantly by Alito, who upheld Gundy's conviction in a holding which strained to preserve the administrative state..  Gorsuch and company noted that it was unconstitutional for Congress to delegate to the Attorney General the authority to restrict someone's liberty.    

Courts Split on CA Accomplice Murder Law:  A 2018 law signed by Governor Jerry Brown (SB 1437), which severely limits a prosecutors ability to charge accomplices to homicide with first-degree murder, is being held unconstitutional by judges in some California counties and is allowing judges in other counties to free accomplices.  J.K. Dineen of the San Francisco Chronicle reports that a bay area judge cited SB 1437 to release a 29-year-old accomplice to a 2008 robbery-murder, while 400 miles to the south, San Bernardino County judges are rejecting petitions for release from accomplices, finding that new law is unconstitutional.  In some counties local judges are divided on the validity of the law.  Gretchen Wenner and Megal Diskin of the Ventura County Star report that last Friday a Ventura County judge refused the petition of an Oxnard woman convicted of being an accomplice to a 2008 robbery and murder.  Weeks earlier, another Ventura judge upheld a gang-murderer's petition for resentencing under the new law.  Prosecutors argue that SB 1437 violates initiatives adopted by voters in 1978 and 1990 which included accomplice murder.  The issue is almost certain to end up before the California Supreme Court.     

Bikini Baristas

And now, for something completely different, comes today's U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Edge v. City of Everett, No.17-36038:

"Bikini barista" stands are drive-through businesses where scantily clad employees sell coffee and other nonalcoholic beverages. In Everett, Washington, a police investigation confirmed complaints that some baristas were engaging in lewd conduct at these establishments, that some baristas had been victimized by patrons, and that other crimes were associated with the stands. The City responded by adopting Everett Municipal Code (EMC) § 5.132.010-060 (the Dress Code Ordinance) requiring that the dress of employees, owners, and operators of Quick-Service Facilities cover "minimum body areas." Separately, the City also broadened its lewd conduct misdemeanor by expanding the Everett Municipal Code's definition of "lewd act" to include the public display of specific parts of the body. EMC § 10.24.010. The City also created a new misdemeanor called Facilitating Lewd Conduct for those who permit, cause or encourage lewd conduct. EMC § 10.24.020

News Scan

Boston Abandons "Broken Windows" Policing:  Last March, the newly elected District Attorney of Suffolk County, MA,  announced that her office would no longer prosecute low level offenders such as petty thieves, drug dealers, prostitutes and trespassers.  The Boston Herald reports that Rachel Rollings, who ran on a progressive criminal justice reform platform, will focus on programs that address the "underlying reasons" for those committing "minor crimes" rather than punishing the offenders.  Former Boston and New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton told reporters that the policy will invite more crime, including more serious crime.  Bratton, who implemented "Broken Windows" policing to dramatically reduce crime in New York City in the 1990s, believes that downtown Boston may see a return of "The Zone" where streets were flooded with pimps, hookers and hustlers in the 70s and 80s.  "There is no such thing as a victimless crime.  The victim is society.  The victim is the neighborhood and the victim is the city," said Bratton.  

SF District Attorney May Challenge LADA Jackie Lacey:  Progressive San Francisco District Attorney George Gascon is contemplating a 2020 campaign for District Attorney of Los Angeles.  Alene Tchekmedyian and James Queally of the Los Angeles Times report that several social justice activists including the San Francisco-based Real Justice PAC have approached Gascon to encourage that he run against Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey.  Lacey, who was first elected in 2012, has been criticized for not being progressive enough, and for her unwillingness to prosecute police officers for alleged excessive force.  In announcing her campaign for reelection Lacey rolled out an impressive list of endorsements from liberal democrats including LA Mayor Eric Garcetti, U.S. House members Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu and several members of the LA Board of Supervisors.  The Real Justice PAC, which helped elect Boston DA Rachel Rollings, would be joined by the ACLU and several groups supported by George Soros in bankrolling the Gascon campaign.  

Violence Surging In CA Jails

In the roughly 8 1/2 years since California lawmakers embarked on an historic sentencing reform campaign, homicides in the state's county jails have increased by 46%.  Alyssa Hodenfield and John Walker of the Sacramento Bee report that the state's effort to eliminate prison overcrowding has transformed jails into violent and overcrowded mini-prisons with neither the resources, training, or the facilities to serve the influx of hardened repeat felons no longer eligible for prison.  In October of 2011, Governor Brown's "Public Safety Realignment" law, AB 109, took effect.  The law shifted sentences for habitual property and drug offenders from prison to county jails, requiring jails originally designed to hold drunks and petty thieves for a year or less to accommodate habitual drug dealers, wife beaters, car thieves, and commercial burglars for years rather than months.  While the state has classified these offenders as low risk for violence, many are violent, gang-affiliated criminals.  The article cites a study by the Public Policy Institute of California that AB 109 has not had an effect on public safety, although the FBI Uniform Crime Report has shown increased violent crime in California for 2015, 2016, and 2017.  This is the first three-year increase in violent crime since 1992.  Also, as noted in earlier posts, thousands of property crimes converted to misdemeanors by Proposition 47, are no longer reported to police, meaning while the overall crime rate (violent+property) appears slightly lower, this is a false indicator.

News Scan

San Francisco Institutes "Blind Charging:"  Timothy Williams of the New York Times reports that San Francisco's District Attorney, George Gascon, believes the key to solving potential racial biases may rest within removing demographic information from prosecutors. The concern for concealing this information from prosecutors is due to the majority of prosecutors being white and/or from higher socioeconomic backgrounds. "Blind Charging" aims at curbing racial prejudice in order to maintain fair charges and convictions regardless of ethnicity. Gascon is hoping this will lend some explanation as to why there is such a large statistical discrepancy among African American defendants charged and arrested in comparison to white defendants. If the outcome of this study proves to be unwavering from prior statistics, the reasoning behind this disproportion may be due to causes such as prior offenses/charges that the evidence is not accounting for.  San Francisco seems to be the first city to enact something of this kind and the results should be interesting.

Drug Bust of Nuestra Familia Prison Gang Troy Pope reports from Your Central Valley that U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott and other agencies announced the arrest of at least 50 individuals involved in drug-trafficking. Those involved had an association with either the Nuestra Familia prison gang or the Norteno street gang. The Nuestra Familia gang was found responsible for drug-trafficking a mass amount of methamphetamine and other controlled substances, as well as firearm offenses and other violent crimes. Unsurprisingly, the elite members of the Nuestra gang were found with contraband cell phones that were used to arrange the transportation of illicit drugs across border and state lines. The narcotics were then taken to a stash house in Kings County where gang members then prepared the drugs for delivery to dealers. This case illuminates how easily prison gangs have been able to run criminal enterprises out of California prisons. 

News Scan

Teen Usage Up in Legal Pot States:  One of the most repeated promises from legalized marijuana advocates has been that allowing the government-regulated sale of the drug will assure that children do not have access to it.  Jennifer Oldham of the Washington Post reports that in the first two states to legalize recreational pot, parents, educators and physicians report that teen usage has increased with often devastating results.  In the Denver area, visits to Children's Hospital Colorado facilities for treatment of cyclic vomiting, paranoia, psychosis and other acute cannabis-related symptoms jumped to 777 in 2015, from 161 in 2005.  A 2018 study by the Journal of Adolescent Health determined that surveys finding that pot use among children has not changed much since 2014, may not reflect the impact of legalization on adolescent health.  Washington's latest Health Youth Survey found that 20% of eighth graders and nearly half of high school seniors consider marijuana to be a low risk activity, although medical and mental health professionals say the impact of high potency pot and edibles is doing major damage to adolescent brains.  "I hope we don't lose a generation of people before we become clear we need to protect our kids' brains," said an adolescent medicine specialist at Seattle Children's Hospital.  But there is a trade off.  Washington raked in $358 million and Colorado reported $266 million in government revenue from pot sales in 2018. 

Addiction and Homelessness

Christopher Rufo has an article in the City Journal titled An Addiction Crisis Disguised as a Housing Crisis: Opioids are fueling homelessness on the West Coast.

Progressive political activists allege that tech companies have inflated housing costs and forced middle-class people onto the streets. Declaring that "no two people living on Skid Row . . . ended up there for the same reasons," Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti, for his part, blames a housing shortage, stagnant wages, cuts to mental health services, domestic and sexual abuse, shortcomings in criminal justice, and a lack of resources for veterans. These factors may all have played a role, but the most pervasive cause of West Coast homelessness is clear: heroin, fentanyl, and synthetic opioids.

"Remaining-In Burglary" and the ACCA

The common-law judges of Olde England defined burglary very narrowly because it was a capital offense and they wanted to avoid hanging people for it. That produced the multi-element definition so popular* on law school criminal law exams. Once we stopped hanging people for burglary, legislatures broadened the definition, but they did not all broaden it in the same way or to the same extent.

This creates a problem for punishing habitual criminals prosecuted for a new crime by a different jurisdiction than the one in which the prior crime was committed. In the federal Armed Career Criminal Act, a felon who illegally possesses a gun and has three designated priors gets 15+ years and is not eligible for probation. See 18 U.S.C. §924(e). "Burglary" is one of the designated priors, but what exactly is a "burglary"?

This multi-faceted question has been to the Supreme Court many times, and the Court addressed one more facet today in Quarles v. United States, No. 17-778. At what point in the crime must the perpetrator have formed the intent to steal, or commit some other crime, within the building?

Price Executed, Finally

Alabama yesterday finally achieved justice for the murder of Bill Lynn. Previously, the Supreme Court had effectively given murderer Christopher Price a stay by waiting too long to vacate the stays erroneously granted by lower federal courts. See prior posts here and here.

Justice Breyer wrote a dissent more notable for what it does not say than what it says.

Recidivism of Released Sex Offenders

Sex offenders released from prison are three times as likely as other released offenders to be arrested for a new sex crime within nine years of release.

Sex offenders released from prison are less likely than other offenders to be arrested for a new crime within nine years of release.

Both of these statements are true, according to a study released today by the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. See the spin potential?

I predict that this study will be exploited in numerous statistics crimes within a year of its release.
The U.S. Supreme Court released an orders list and decisions today. There are no criminal cases of note, but there is action in two civil suits against law enforcement officers.

On the orders list, the El Paso cross-border shooting case of Hernandez v. Mesa is back for a sequel. "Once more into the breach, dear friends ..." Update: Brent Kendall has this story on the case in the WSJ.

Nieves v. Bartlett, No. 17-1174, involves a claim of retaliatory arrest when the police did, in fact, have probable cause to make the arrest. The presence of probable cause generally defeats a First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim. However, for a warrantless misdemeanor arrest, the "no-probable-cause requirement should not apply when a plaintiff presents objective evidence that he was arrested when otherwise similarly situated individuals not engaged in the same sort of protected speech had not been."

The opinion of the Court is by Chief Justice Roberts, joined in full by Justices Breyer, Alito, Kagan, and Kavanaugh. Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Ginsburg concur in varying parts. Only Justice Sotomayor dissents entirely. The line-up analyzers will have fun with that one.
For several years now, I have been tracking the crime rates reported in the FBI's Preliminary Semiannual Uniform Crime Report. The 2016 post, with notes on the data, is here. The 2018 post is here. For an earlier look at regions, rather than states, see this post from 2014.

For the current report -- data for the first half of 2018 versus the first half of 2017 in cities over 100,000 population -- we once again see that California compares unfavorably with the rest of the country. This year, though, the year-to-year change is only worse in violent crimes, not property crimes.

Fireworks in Execution Cases

Today's criminal law action in the U.S. Supreme Court is mostly in the "Opinions Relating to Orders" section, where individual Justices opine on whether the Court should or should not have stayed an execution, taken a case up, or sent it back to a lower court for a "do over."

Proposition 57, passed by California voters in November 2016, mandated that all allegations of criminal conduct against a minor (under age 18) must be initiated in juvenile court.  Pre-Proposition 57, minors ages 14+ could be tried in adult court in 1 of 3 ways: (1) statutory waiver; (2) prosecutorial waiver; or (3) judicial waiver.  Proposition 57 eliminated options 1 and 2.  In early 2018, the California Supreme Court held that Proposition 57 applied retroactively to all cases that were not final at the time of its enactment.  (See my post here for more details).

Alexander Cervantes was 14 years old when he was directly charged as an adult for committing horrific sex crimes against a 13-year-old girl.  Cervantes was convicted by a jury and his case was pending on appeal when Proposition 57 passed.  (CJLF filed a brief in his case arguing that Prop 57 should not be applied retroactively).  He benefited from the Proposition's retroactivity and his case was sent back to the juvenile court so that a judge could decide if his case should stay there or be transferred to adult court.  However, while his transfer hearing was pending, former California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 1391.  SB 1391 "repeal[ed] the authority of a District Attorney to make a motion to transfer" 14- and 15-year-old offenders from juvenile court to adult court.  There is an odd exception in the law for 14- and 15-year-olds who "were not apprehended prior to the end of juvenile court jurisdiction."  SB 1391 went into effect on 1/1/19.  In a nutshell, 14- and 15-year-old criminals must stay and be tried in juvenile court and in no way can a judge decide if he or she should be transferred to adult court.  This is true regardless of the crime committed.    

Apology Tour

Rafael Mangual of the Manhattan Institute has this op-ed in the WSJ on former Veep Joe Biden and criminal justice. He was mostly right the first time.

Even before announcing that he would seek the Democratic presidential nomination, Joe Biden was busy apologizing. At a Martin Luther King Day speech to Al Sharpton's National Action Network, Mr. Biden said "I haven't always been right" about criminal justice and "white America has to admit there's still a systematic racism and it goes almost unnoticed by so many of us."

Not long ago Mr. Biden publicly defended his role in shaping the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which funded the hiring of more cops and encouraged more "truth in sentencing" by requiring that prisoners actually serve the majority of their sentences before becoming eligible for parole. That law, Barack Obama's vice president said in 2016, "restored American cities." Mr. Biden, who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1994, reiterated that view in his 2017 memoir.

Life-Sentenced Killers Who Kill Again

Dear Governor Newsom:

If the murderer described in Cresencio Rodriguez-Delgado's story in the Fresno Bee is, in fact, convicted of the new crime charged, what punishment do you think is appropriate?

(a) Death

(b) No punishment at all (a.k.a. a life sentence for a person already sentenced to life in prison)

SCOTUS Wraps Oral Arguments for the Term

The U.S. Supreme Court today finished its oral arguments for the current term, which began on the first Monday of last October. The court heard Quarles v. United States, No. 17-778, yet another case on how to handle the varying definitions of crimes in our 50 states for the purpose of the federal Armed Career Criminal Act. The transcript is here.

Does a person have a prior conviction of "burglary" for the ACCA when he was convicted under a law that defines mental element of burglary as either intending to commit a crime at the time of entry (the common law definition) or alternatively forming that intent after entry (as many states allow)? Note that a person who actually committed the common law crime would still get off if the court requires the narrower definition, because under the "categorical approach" it is only how the crime is defined, not what the perpetrator actually did, that counts.
On its face, the U.S. Supreme Court case of Bucklew v. Precythe, No. 17-8151, seemed to present a fairly narrow issue. The State of Missouri is generally among the best of the states in the way it carries out executions. That state has remained able to acquire the drug of choice, pentobarbital. Even so, Bucklew claimed that due to his unusual medical condition use of the barbiturate-only lethal injection method would be unconstitutionally cruel as applied to him.

The opinion of the Court by Justice Gorsuch for a bare majority not only rejects that argument, but sweeps in a lot along the way. At the beginning of the discussion of the law (i.e., part II, after the summary of facts and case) we have this remarkable paragraph:

The Constitution allows capital punishment. [Cites to Glossip and Baze and discussion of founding-era punishment and recognition of capital cases in Fifth Amendment.] Of course, that doesn't mean the American people must continue to use the death penalty. The same Constitution that permits States to authorize capital punishment also allows them to outlaw it. But it does mean that the judiciary bears no license to end a debate reserved for the people and their representatives.

That is the strongest statement of the unquestionable constitutionality of capital punishment that I have ever seen in an opinion of the Court, rather than in a concurring or dissenting opinion. It is as emphatic as the absolute statement of Justice Hugo Black (who was fond of absolute statements) nearly half a century ago in McGautha v. California.

Another Misleading Poll

I have been told that the Public Policy Institute of California is going to release a poll that supposedly shows a majority against the death penalty. As I have noted many times on this blog, you get dramatically different results depending on how you ask the question. See this post.

Sure enough, PPIC used the skewed-to-the-max wording that implies the respondent is being asked to specify a single punishment for all first-degree murders. If that were the question, I would say LWOP myself. But it is not.

News Scan

Illegal Kills Washington Cop:  One Sheriff's Deputy died and another officer was wounded Tuesday in a shootout with an illegal alien near the college town of Ellensburg, Washington.  Eric Lacitis of The Seattle Times reports that Juan Manuel Flores Del Toro, a citizen of Mexico, led the officers responding to a road-rage incident on a chase that ended at a trailer park.  Flores Del Toro exited the car and opened fire on the officers, killing deputy Ryan Thompson and injuring officer Benito Chavez.  Flores Del Toro was also fatally wounded in the shootout.  Thompson was the married father of three.  It was the first murder of a police officer in the county since 1927.    
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99  

Monthly Archives