There are two parts to the column, as there are two reports out of Ferguson. The first part is the exoneration of Officer Wilson and the discrediting of the reports that were so widely reported and believed. He notes that some witnesses were afraid the tell the truth and contradict "the narrative reported by the media" for fear of reprisal in the neighborhood.
Now there's a story for the media: A community in which honest people can't tell the truth for fear of running afoul local thugs enforcing "the narrative reported by the media." Or is that more of a story about the media?The second part has to do with the second report about the larger picture in Ferguson, and particularly that report's use of statistics. Here we run into our old adversary, the fallacy that I call The Fallacy of the Irrelevant Denominator.
