Parole Denied in Bizarre California Plane Murder: A California
state panel denied parole Tuesday for 62-year-old Lawrence Cowell, a
southern California man convicted of murdering his childhood friend,
Scott Campbell, for money then throwing his body out of an airplane into
the Pacific Ocean. Cowell admitted in the parole hearing that he was
responsible for Campbell's death but wouldn't admit that he killed him. District Attorney Tony
Rackauckas said, "Instead of accepting responsibility for what he did
and showing
remorse, Cowell has continued to lie, shift the blame to others and
assault innocent people each time he was briefly set free." When
Campbell was killed, Cowell was free on bail awaiting trial for driving
drunk that caused a crash that killed his passenger. While free on bail awaiting his murder trial, Cowell assaulted his father and bit
the finger off of his mother's hand. He was also convicted in 1985 for
murder and conspiracy to commit murder and robbery, but had his
conviction overturned on the grounds that evidence was improperly
admitted. The parole board ruled that Cowell can apply for parole again
in five years. In response to the board's decision, Campbell's mother
said, "It's not about bringing Scotty back," she said of her son, who
was 27
when he died. "We can't do that. But it's about protecting life. Now I
know that for five years people will be safe from Cowell." The San
Francisco Chronicle has this story.
Michigan State Police Defend Use of High-Tech Devices: Following up on Michigan's controversial high tech device that allows officers to search cell phones during traffic stops, Michigan State Police stand behind the technology and claim they are not abusing the public trust by improperly downloading smartphone data during traffic stops. State police inspector Greg Zarotney appeared before the House Oversight Reform and Ethics Committee to discuss concerns about the devices. Zarotney said the devices are not used during routine traffic stops and are only used as an investigative tool for major cases such as homicide and child exploitation-and only with a search warrant or with the phone owner's consent. Michigan State Police officials continue to deny the ACLU requests for information showing how this device actually works. House Oversight Reform and Ethics Committee members say they will likely recall Michigan State Police officials to answer more questions about how the agency actually uses the new technology. The Lansing State Journal his this story.
Michigan State Police Defend Use of High-Tech Devices: Following up on Michigan's controversial high tech device that allows officers to search cell phones during traffic stops, Michigan State Police stand behind the technology and claim they are not abusing the public trust by improperly downloading smartphone data during traffic stops. State police inspector Greg Zarotney appeared before the House Oversight Reform and Ethics Committee to discuss concerns about the devices. Zarotney said the devices are not used during routine traffic stops and are only used as an investigative tool for major cases such as homicide and child exploitation-and only with a search warrant or with the phone owner's consent. Michigan State Police officials continue to deny the ACLU requests for information showing how this device actually works. House Oversight Reform and Ethics Committee members say they will likely recall Michigan State Police officials to answer more questions about how the agency actually uses the new technology. The Lansing State Journal his this story.

Leave a comment