Blog of the Legal Times has AG Holder's response to Judge Jerry Smith's question on whether the Administration still believes in judicial review. As directed, it is three pages (well, 2 1/3), single spaced. As expected, it is filled with well-established and mostly uncontroversial stuff about judicial review, deference, yada, yada, yada.
Then there is the last sentence: "The President's remarks were fully consistent with the principles described herein."
I've already said in a previous post and a comment that I think the president's original statement was preposterous but also that Judge Smith was out of line. I won't comment any further. Cut loose in the comments, if you like.
Then there is the last sentence: "The President's remarks were fully consistent with the principles described herein."
I've already said in a previous post and a comment that I think the president's original statement was preposterous but also that Judge Smith was out of line. I won't comment any further. Cut loose in the comments, if you like.

Much ado about very little, IMHO.
federalist, I could not agree more. The words "tempest" and "teapot" come to mind.