<< If Prop 34 Fails, California Could See a Wave of Executions | Main | News Scan >>


Tacoma News-Tribune Reluctantly Endorses Sanders

| 1 Comment
The News-Tribune in Tacoma, Washington has one of the most perceptive editorials on a judicial race I have seen in a long time, aptly titled "Our tortured pick for state Supreme Court: Sanders."  In the primary for Washington Supreme Court, the voters had a choice between the good, the bad, and the OMG.  In the general election, it's down to the latter two.

Not that we don't like Richard Sanders and Sheryl Gordon McCloud. Each is highly intelligent and devoted to the law. It comes down to the role of the judiciary. Either McCloud or Sanders would bring a settled ideological agenda to the cases that reach the high court.

Sanders is a doctrinaire libertarian. McCloud is what used to be called a flaming liberal. Passionate political beliefs keep the fires of democracy burning, but good court decisions aren't born in furnaces. Sanders and McCloud both appear likely to equate their personal philosophies with constitutional dictates.


Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/10/22/2340316/our-tortured-pick-for-state-supreme.html#storylink=cpy
Used to be?

This is a matter of degree and temperament. Every judge brings a personal approach to the law, but sometimes the law is bigger than the judge. We don't think Sanders gets this.

Unfortunately, we have precisely the same concerns about McCloud.

Her passion is criminal defense. She's spent much of her long career battling death penalties and fighting for what she calls "social justice constitutional rights." Attorneys like McCloud are absolutely essential to our criminal justice system; courts can become lynching parties if due process and effective defenders aren't provided for everyone - even depraved killers.

The problem is, McCloud's advocacy doesn't appear to have an off switch. If she were gowned in black, we don't think she'd be any more impartial than Sanders.

The question: Which of the two would add more to the court?

The Supreme Court is already dominated by justices with moderate liberal leanings; McCloud would likely slide immediately into its left-most seat and make the orthodoxy more orthodox.

Sanders' chief contribution over the years has been to challenge his colleagues and force them to confront issues they might otherwise have ignored. A contrarian justice can sharpen his colleagues' thinking even when he's wrong.

We wouldn't want five like Sanders on the court, or even two. But given this choice, we'll go for one.


Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/10/22/2340316/our-tortured-pick-for-state-supreme.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/10/22/2340316/our-tortured-pick-for-state-supreme.html#storylink=cpy

1 Comment

Good for the TNT. As Kent observes, this is one of the most insightful endorsement editorials I've seen in a very long time.

The one thing the TNT didn't mention is one of the main reasons that many Washington prosecutors will be holding their noses and voting for Sanders: he will only serve one term before he reaches mandatory retirement age under the state constitution, whereas McCloud has the potential to be on the court for multiple terms.

Leave a comment