<< Why We Need Broken Windows Policing | Main | USCA9 Flips Yet Another Death Sentence >>


Broken Windows Policing, Part II

| 2 Comments
About five minutes before I read Kent's post about broken windows policing, I received the following message from a Facebook friend who lived it:

Some of you may have noticed a pattern in our "national conversation about race" in which the focus of attention has shifted from racist cops to institutional racism of police departments and now, is focused squarely on the "broken windows" theory of policing, so-named for an article in the Atlantic Monthly by Harvard Prof. James Q. Wilson, based on his research of many years on the tolerance of petty crime in urban areas. There has been a blizzard of articles like this one over the last two weeks, executed on cue. Be prepared to hear [these] arguments in Derrick Jackson's piece over and over, in the media and on FB.

Having lived in Boston and later in NYC during both the late Koch years through Giuliani's first term, I saw this proactive method of policing introduced, and it produced results within one year. Most people, however, have no memory or knowledge of what it was like to live in a place where every public park, train, wall was defaced with graffiti and gang markers, where tot lots were used for drug deals in the open daylight, where muggings were a routine occurrence and the victim was blamed for "being there at that hour of night" or for "what she was wearing," etc. People don't remember putting the "NO RADIO" sign in your windshield after you'd lost several of them already and had given up replacing them.
Back then, the people who are now using the events of Ferguson and Staten Island to attack "broken windows" policing were telling us that graffiti was an under-appreciated art form, that the most effective measure to stop crime was "neighborhood awareness," and "denial of opportunity" by not walking in the park, not going to the tot lot, not driving though certain neighborhoods.

For those people too dense to understand Wilson's findings and the 30 years of real world results to back them up, they might see an "abandoned home" analogy as more apt. A house, in whatever shape, that is lived in and used every day by people, can be kept clean and comfortable to its occupants, free of vermin. Vermin, in fact, try to avoid the occupants. But once abandoned, stray animals enter, insects penetrate and eat the wood, weeds invade the masonry, and eventually vandals use it for target practice. The whole thing returns to sod. That is Wilson's theory in a nutshell: It's about abandonment, which is what we did to our public spaces back in the 60s and 70s, and apparently what most liberals are prepared to do once again.
'Broken windows,' broken policy - The Boston Globe
www.bostonglobe.com

"Broken windows" policing is in shards after the killings of Eric Garner, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice ...

2 Comments

My wish for 2015 is that I never I have to read or hear the term "national conversation" about anything ever again.

The Atlantic article referred to was co-authored by George Kelling, who is also one of the authors of the City Journal article noted in my post.

Leave a comment

Monthly Archives