<< News Scan | Main | News Scan >>


Now that We've Advanced the Agenda, We Can Tell the Truth

| 0 Comments
The print and electronic media were falling all over themselves to tell the story of the Ferguson, MO shooting last summer:  The narrative, though not put in exactly these words, was simple:  A Klansman-wannabe whose day job was as a policeman shot an unarmed black teenager out of a particularly malignant form of "white privilege."  It was the latter day version of a Jim Crow  --  a quasi-slavery system of white oppression that had never really gone away, although it had (usually) been more cleverly disguised.

The story was made particularly horrible by what became its catchphrase:  "Hands up, don't shoot!"  Brown was portrayed as the compliant, non-threatening and promising black kid (complete in many pictures used at the time in cap-and-gown) gunned down for no reason but racial supremacy by a cop who had been brought up in a culture that told him there was no consequence for taking black lives.

The Ferguson story was leveraged big time to create commissions, both in Missouri and in the White House, to "study" ongoing racist attitudes  --  or, as the more cynical among us might think, to undermine confidence in and respect for law and the means sometimes needed to enforce it.  More broadly, it was used as the newest, biggest Guilt Cudgel in the culture war.

A good deal of time now having passed, and the shaming mission having been well-launched, Eric Holder's DOJ can now afford to tell the truth, as related in today's WSJ story, "US Won't Charge Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson."
From the story:

The Justice Department said it would not file federal civil-rights charges against the former Ferguson, Mo., police officer who shot an unarmed black teen last year, saying the high legal threshold for such a case had not been met.

At the same time, the Justice Department painted a damning portrait of widespread racial bias in the Ferguson police department, releasing a lengthy report cataloging what the U.S. says is unconstitutional police treatment of blacks in the St. Louis suburb.

********************

The confrontation began when Mr. Wilson, riding in a police SUV, saw Mr. Brown and a friend walking in a street, and told them to move onto the sidewalk. Words were exchanged and Mr. Wilson backed up his vehicle to speak to Mr. Brown, according to witnesses. Though witness accounts differ, Mr. Wilson said Mr. Brown reached into his vehicle, striking him and trying to grab his weapon. Mr. Wilson fired at Mr. Brown, witnesses said, then got out of the car and fired at him again and killed him.

In an 86-page report on the shooting probe, prosecutors concluded "there is no evidence upon which prosecutors can rely to disprove [Mr.] Wilson's stated subjective belief that he feared for his safety."

Federal investigators concluded the claims by some witnesses that Mr. Brown was running away when he was shot were contradicted by forensic evidence and other witnesses. Claims by some witnesses that Mr. Brown had his hands up as if to surrender at the time Mr. Wilson shot him weren't reliable, prosecutors concluded.


You see the point here.  It was never to go after Darren Wilson.  The defense bar often reminds us that persons suspected of crime are real human beings, flesh-and-blood figures with strengths and failings just like the rest of us.  But viewing Wilson in that way was never useful to the cause, so the usual meme (along with the typical caution about the presumption of innocence) got left on the editing room floor.

Wilson was seen less as a criminal suspect, or even  as a human being, than as a cipher.  He was the place holder for the White Devil  --  the same White Devil that has made our criminal justice system just a racist charade.  And that is why DOJ's quiet admission of the truth, that there was no evidence of racial animus, has to come out only now, with the summer's furor long since iced over.

Leave a comment

Monthly Archives