There are reasons to vote for, and reasons to vote against, the confirmation of Loretta Lynch as Attorney General. Kent and I have discussed the question in several places.
Kent has noted that Ms. Lynch, while not an ideal candidate from the perspective of those favoring resolute enforcement of criminal law, is about the best we can expect from this Administration. I have expressed more than a little concern about Ms. Lynch's complicity is what she could not help knowing was perverse, and -- much more troubling -- unethical behavior by Judge John Gleeson. On the other hand, I am favorably impressed with her refusal to adopt the liberal line on pot.
The vote on her nomination has not yet been taken in the Senate. For whatever one might make of the procedural maneuvers involved, today we saw the announcement of an unusual but some might say compelling reason to delay the vote for weeks. Maybe months.
The Congress-following paper The Hill has the story.

Leave a comment