President Obama has said that, if we can save even one child from a violent death by stronger gun control, we should do it. Indeed, conscience requires us to do it. The tape of his remarks is here; the "one child" statement is toward the end.
Question: For those who expressed no disagreement with the President's view, then, if we can save even one child by preserving our present sentencing system instead of diluting it, should we?
I ask because, as I noted in this post, we have already lost two children we know about (and one adult) to retroactive, dumbed-down federal drug sentencing. If we can prevent more child murder by keeping serious sentences, should we -- or, in the name of a hidebound, feckless and false "criminals-are-victims" ideology, should we look the other way?
Barack Obama's DoJ has significantly dropped the prosecution of gun criminals. How many people who shouldn't be on the streets are on the streets. Obama also is indifferent to the heroin epidemic sweeping America,
People like to think that Obama is a good person who is merely wrong--I disagree--I think he is a deeply evil man.