James Taranto at the WSJ has this column listing some of the reaction to Donald Trump's email comments yesterday. "Reaction was swift and, we will argue, overwrought." My take is in this post. Part of the disagreement is on how you interpret what he said, and there is some room for reasonable disagreement there. What is most certainly out-of-bounds, though, is the hysterical claim that his comment is treason.
Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution. The Framers put the definition there and made it exceedingly narrow to preclude the kind of creative definitions of treason that were instruments of tyranny in England at least as far back as the notorious King Henry VIII. Here is the American definition:
Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution. The Framers put the definition there and made it exceedingly narrow to preclude the kind of creative definitions of treason that were instruments of tyranny in England at least as far back as the notorious King Henry VIII. Here is the American definition:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.Are we at war with Russia? Nope. The treason talk can stop right there. QED.
Leave a comment