From Rehab to Rape: A man who pled guilty for beating a woman last September was arrested last week for a brutal rape. Julia Comnes of the Woodburn Independent reports that Ramiro Garcia-Solano was arrested last week for the kidnap, rape, sodomy, and injury of a woman in Marion County, Oregon. Garcia-Solano was convicted of domestic violence for beating another woman last fall and was sentenced to a batterer intervention program. He failed to complete the program with apparent impunity. Oregon, like California, does not treat domestic violence as a serious crime, and generally sentences offenders to a quick jail visit, probation and a program.
<< News Scan | Main | What's Behind the Big Increase in Life Sentences? >>
6 Comments
Leave a comment
Search
Recent Entries
- Crime and Consequences Has Moved
- Abolish the Police?
- News Scan
- Cal. Law on Mandatory Reporting of Kiddie Porn May (or May Not) Be Unconstitutional
- USCA9 Upholds Sentence of Serial Murderer/Rapist Dean Carter
- News Scan
- Robocalls
- Venue at 30,000 Feet
- News Scan
- Supreme Court Takes Excessive Force/Seizure Case
Monthly Archives
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (25)
- November 2019 (35)
- October 2019 (27)
- September 2019 (26)
- August 2019 (22)
- July 2019 (29)
- June 2019 (26)
- May 2019 (36)
- April 2019 (33)
- March 2019 (31)
- February 2019 (21)
- January 2019 (28)
- December 2018 (19)
- November 2018 (17)
- October 2018 (44)
- September 2018 (45)
- August 2018 (34)
- July 2018 (33)
- June 2018 (52)
- May 2018 (34)
- April 2018 (45)
- March 2018 (39)
- February 2018 (56)
- January 2018 (50)
- December 2017 (50)
- November 2017 (43)
- October 2017 (60)
- September 2017 (53)
- August 2017 (46)
- July 2017 (41)
- June 2017 (86)
- May 2017 (87)
- April 2017 (68)
- March 2017 (57)
- February 2017 (66)
- January 2017 (52)
- December 2016 (57)
- November 2016 (79)
- October 2016 (66)
- September 2016 (60)
- August 2016 (72)
- July 2016 (120)
- June 2016 (93)
- May 2016 (80)
- April 2016 (68)
- March 2016 (78)
- February 2016 (80)
- January 2016 (82)
- December 2015 (72)
- November 2015 (63)
- October 2015 (100)
- September 2015 (81)
- August 2015 (76)
- July 2015 (78)
- June 2015 (88)
- May 2015 (110)
- April 2015 (95)
- March 2015 (92)
- February 2015 (65)
- January 2015 (78)
- December 2014 (126)
- November 2014 (72)
- October 2014 (95)
- September 2014 (85)
- August 2014 (92)
- July 2014 (81)
- June 2014 (73)
- May 2014 (104)
- April 2014 (96)
- March 2014 (62)
- February 2014 (70)
- January 2014 (66)
- December 2013 (57)
- November 2013 (68)
- October 2013 (67)
- September 2013 (57)
- August 2013 (90)
- July 2013 (54)
- June 2013 (65)
- May 2013 (103)
- April 2013 (135)
- March 2013 (84)
- February 2013 (79)
- January 2013 (81)
- December 2012 (96)
- November 2012 (65)
- October 2012 (110)
- September 2012 (74)
- August 2012 (95)
- July 2012 (70)
- June 2012 (80)
- May 2012 (86)
- April 2012 (84)
- March 2012 (78)
- February 2012 (58)
- January 2012 (63)
- December 2011 (42)
- November 2011 (73)
- October 2011 (108)
- September 2011 (98)
- August 2011 (95)
- July 2011 (84)
- June 2011 (90)
- May 2011 (125)
- April 2011 (90)
- March 2011 (123)
- February 2011 (96)
- January 2011 (102)
- December 2010 (106)
- November 2010 (88)
- October 2010 (102)
- September 2010 (107)
- August 2010 (83)
- July 2010 (78)
- June 2010 (96)
- May 2010 (102)
- April 2010 (108)
- March 2010 (105)
- February 2010 (100)
- January 2010 (113)
- December 2009 (58)
- November 2009 (72)
- October 2009 (89)
- September 2009 (85)
- August 2009 (62)
- July 2009 (61)
- June 2009 (72)
- May 2009 (65)
- April 2009 (60)
- March 2009 (90)
- February 2009 (56)
- January 2009 (57)
- December 2008 (71)
- November 2008 (62)
- October 2008 (74)
- September 2008 (52)
- August 2008 (33)
- July 2008 (56)
- June 2008 (71)
- May 2008 (54)
- April 2008 (83)
- March 2008 (51)
- February 2008 (40)
- January 2008 (40)
- December 2007 (34)
- November 2007 (41)
- October 2007 (45)
- September 2007 (47)
- August 2007 (42)
- July 2007 (49)
- June 2007 (61)
- May 2007 (55)
- April 2007 (55)
- March 2007 (55)
- February 2007 (57)
- January 2007 (51)
- December 2006 (30)
- November 2006 (46)
- October 2006 (52)
- September 2006 (30)
- August 2006 (44)
- July 2006 (34)
- June 2006 (26)
- May 2006 (14)
- April 2006 (1)
About C & C Blog
About CJLF
Issues
- Academia (96)
- Appeal (3)
- Blog (37)
- Cases (130)
- Civil Suits (75)
- Clemency (49)
- Collateral Consequences (9)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (103)
- Counsel (173)
- Criminal Procedure (194)
- Death Penalty (1918)
- Drugs (223)
- Equal Protection (11)
- Evidence (246)
- Federal Courts (133)
- Federalism (45)
- Firearms (49)
- First Amendment (105)
- Forfeiture (7)
- General (989)
- Habeas Corpus (469)
- Humor (129)
- Immigration (92)
- International (171)
- Journalism (33)
- Judicial Selection (165)
- Judiciary (14)
- Jury Trial (30)
- Juveniles (119)
- Mental State (290)
- Military (3)
- National Security (20)
- News Scan (2434)
- Notorious Cases (493)
- Off Topic (51)
- Policing (216)
- Policy (7)
- Politics (688)
- Polls (80)
- Prisons (299)
- Probation and Parole (72)
- Public Order (73)
- Rehabilitation (34)
- Schools (6)
- Search and Seizure (211)
- Self-defense (14)
- Sentencing (837)
- Sex offenses (60)
- Social Factors (177)
- State Courts (77)
- Studies (360)
- Stupid Crooks (7)
- Terrorism (301)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1692)
- USDoJ (102)
- Use of Force (45)
- Victims' Rights (57)
Links
Blogs
SCOTUSblog
Bench Memos (NRO)
The Volokh Conspiracy
Sentencing Law & Policy
Homicide Survivors
FedSoc Blog
The Cert Pool
Bench Memos (NRO)
The Volokh Conspiracy
Sentencing Law & Policy
Homicide Survivors
FedSoc Blog
The Cert Pool
"Batterer intervention program"?
I love it when the pro-criminal side invents some fancy new name for the failed rehab programs they were so in love with in the Sixties and Seventies. I suppose it's also "data driven." Aren't they all.
First the Left promotes racism by wanting to go soft on drug dealing, which disproportionately harms minority neighborhoods; now they want to promote sexism by going soft on domestic violence, too.
Still, their next PR video about how humane they are will be coming out tomorrow. Be sure to catch it at your nearest crack house. Special introduction by defense bar hero Wendell Callahan -- a man of great kindness to both blacks and women.
This is a great blog and kudos to the admins and writers. I don't enjoy comment spaces on the web for obvious reasons, but feel compelled to make a brief comment about this. I am writing only for myself and not for my agency.
The tone, both of the post, written by "Staff," and of Mr. Otis' comment, deeply troubled me. Prosecuting cases of domestic violence is extremely difficult and something that all prosecutors I know and work with take very seriously. If prosecutors were able to routinely obtain convictions for domestic violence, more significant plea offers would be commonplace as defense attorneys and defendants would be more willing to walk into (arguably) meaningful jail or prison time. Unfortunately, jurors are not always willing to convict--something that varies dramatically by jurisdiction--and victims are commonly uncooperative, both on the stand and pre-trial.
As a result, batterers intervention programs, whether as a component of pre-trial diversion or probation, may be the most significant punishment that can be had in a given case. That, I don't think, is a reflection on the fact that prosecutors or legislators do not take domestic violence seriously. It is, instead, a reflection of the extremely difficult nature of domestic violence prosecutions.
I have to confess I am disappointed by what I have read here. Thanks for your time.
AnonPros: So I get how difficult it is to get a conviction for domestic violence, but when a DA is able to get one, should it be treated as a serious crime, or some kind of behavior disorder? As noted in the NewsScan, Oregon and California law does not consider domestic violence a serious crime, and both states punish a conviction like it was petty theft. That's the legislature and the Governor's fault. Just about everybody in CA law enforcement including the DAs opposed the law that weakened the consequences for domestic violence. Six years of efforts to amend it have received no serious legislative support. I think that guys who beat up women should get more than a program. I've read too many cases where the best a beaten wife or girlfriend can get is a restraining order, followed by the guy coming back to kill or maim her. Nobody is blaming the DAs. They should be given the tools to protect the victims.
The Left specializes in inventing new names for old programs, the better to disguise that what they actually want is a return to the feckless, and dangerous, indulgences that brought us a generation of increased crime, from the mid-Sixties to the dawn of the Nineties.
"Batterer intervention program" is such a name. It's not punishment; it's pretend punishment.
You say you're disappointed with the tone of the entry and my comment. Were you disappointed with the facts reported in the entry? That the defendant regarded his first "sentence" (to participate in the batterer intervention program) as exactly the joke it turned out to be?
I was a prosecutor (an AUSA) for most of my career. Not once did I seek, nor would I have accepted, a so-called punishment based in euphemism and psychobabble. Criminals know when the system is unserious. This criminal knew it too, and a new victim paid the price for its Happy Face foolishness.
I'm not inclined to dismiss a program based on its name or on a sweeping generalization. "Domestic violence" includes a broad spectrum of offenses. Many victims choose to stay in the relationship and try again. Sometimes this is a self-destructive choice with tragic results, but that is not to say there are not cases at the lower end of the spectrum where counseling can work.
I'm all for counseling, but as a supplement to, not a replacement for, actual punishment.
Sentencing involves risk, one way or the other. Too harsh or too forgiving. One of the main questions, then, is to whom the burden of risk should be assigned. To me, this seems easy: It should be assigned to the person who caused the problem to begin with, rather than the next victim if the desire for leniency doesn't work out.
In the case presented here, it could be that the batterer reconciled with his first victim, and she with him. But one must wonder whether, regardless of the possibly good results between those two, the "intervention program" was so lacking in deterrent value that it contributed to a feeling of license, which in turn contributed to the rape of the second victim.