The US Supreme Court has taken up the case of Missouri v. McNeely, No. 11-1425. A Missouri Highway Patrol officer stopped McNeely for speeding. McNeely appeared to be intoxicated and refused the breathalyzer test. The officer took him to a hospital for a blood test without consent or a warrant. The Missouri Supreme Court held that this violated the Fourth Amendment.
The Question Presented, as framed by counsel for Missouri, is "Whether a law enforcement officer may obtain a nonconsensual and warrantless blood sample from a drunk driver under the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement based upon the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream."
The Question Presented, as framed by counsel for Missouri, is "Whether a law enforcement officer may obtain a nonconsensual and warrantless blood sample from a drunk driver under the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement based upon the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream."

Leave a comment