August 2018 Archives
Exclusionary rule: In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), Justice Antonin Scalia wrote an opinion--joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito--that called for the elimination of the exclusionary rule in Fourth Amendment cases. He argued that the costs of excluding evidence when police officers violate the Fourth Amendment outweigh the benefits of doing so. Justice Kennedy agreed to the result in that case, but declared that the continued operation of the exclusionary rule was not in doubt. But with Kennedy being replaced by Kavanaugh, there could be five votes to overrule a doctrine that conservatives have opposed for decades.Really? I have been arguing to limit Mapp for many years. I think I would remember if the Supreme Court came within a single vote of overruling it completely, especially in a case where my organization filed a brief.
David Quintana, a lobbyist for the California Bail Agents Association, said he believes the referendum will be "overwhelmingly successful," because Californians are tired of the stream of recent laws rolling back tough criminal statutes and sentencing laws to reduce the state's overcrowded prison population.
"The public is going to rise up and support stronger public safety," he said.
If they gather the signatures in time, the effective date of the bill will be postponed until November 2020, unless the Governor calls a special election. If he does that, the Prop. 47/57 fix initiative will also get an earlier vote. (See Art. II § 8(c).) Stay tuned.
That is apparent from five sources of law: the text and original understanding of Article I, the overall structure of the Constitution, landmark Supreme Court precedent, longstanding federal statutes, and deeply rooted U.S. military commission practice.First, the text and original understanding of Article I demonstrate that international law does not impose a limit on Congress's authority to make offenses triable by military commission.
Imagine that, not only looking to the text and original understanding of the Constitution, but looking to them first. That is really the only approach to constitutional interpretation that is consistent with a respect for the people's right of self-government, i.e., democracy. The Constitution means what the people meant it to mean until the people, not the courts, change it.
Given that Boumediene was wrongly decided (see CJLF brief), that would be a significant change in the correct direction.And given that a Justice Kavanaugh would replace Justice Anthony Kennedy -- the swing vote in several key national security cases (such as Boumediene v. Bush, in which the Supreme Court held that Guantanamo detainees have a constitutional right to habeas corpus) -- his impact in this area of the law could bring significant change when such cases reach the court.
But I noticed an odd repetition in my review: On more than one occasion, Kavanaugh has begun an opinion by saying: "This is a Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule case." Might this portend his agreement with some Supreme Court justices, that the "exclusionary rule" adopted universally in 1961 in Mapp v. Ohio should be reconsidered?
In only the second time in her career, District Attorney Nancy O'Malley will pursue the death penalty for defendant Mark Estrada, accused of killing Sgt. Scott Lunger, 48, a Brentwood father of two. Lunger was fatally shot in the head and thigh shortly after he approached a white Chevrolet Silverado he had stopped for swerving in the roadway at 3:15 a.m. July 22, 2015, in Hayward.
Then again, the idea that mere suspicion of criminality is enough to stop a president from engaging in his constitutional duty is a completely new one, designed, as most things these days, only for Trump.
The Whitewater investigation went on for nearly 3,000 days. Did that mean that any court with Stephen Breyer, nominated after an independent investigation was launched, became "fundamentally illegitimate?" I mean, that investigation ended up convicting 15 friends and allies of the Clintons for over 40 crimes, including felonies like fraud, bribery and embezzlement. Talk about a "cloud of suspicion." Clinton himself was impeached, not on campaign finance charges, but on obstruction of justice and perjury. His wife was under investigation throughout most of her 2016 campaign, and not one serious person claimed that her SCOTUS nominees would be "illegitimate."
Democratic senators demanded Wednesday that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation be put on hold, saying he's too tainted by President Trump's potential legal troubles.
A prime example occurred two months ago when one of the trailer bills was loaded up with a massive rewrite of the state's criminal laws, allowing virtually anyone convicted of a felony, even rape or murder, to avoid prison if they are declared in need of psychiatric treatment and they receive it for two years.
Gov. Jerry Brown, who has made softening California's criminal laws a hallmark of his final term, backed the change but prosecutors howled that it was a get-out-of-jail card for vicious criminals and complained, with good reason, about the diversion language being buried in a massive "trailer bill" relating to social services rather than being openly debated and decided.
With California's Legislature and Governor hell-bent on passing as much pro-criminal, anti-victim, anti-law-abiding-people, anti-law-enforcement legislation as they possibly can, I have begun to wonder if there is any bottom. Is there any depth below which they will not sink? Is there any depth below which the voters will wake up and vote the bums out?
The drive to put ever more criminals and more dangerous ones on the streets gathers steam, funded by Soros money on the left and Koch money on the libertarian side, leaving relatively few defenders of the strong and sensible policies that have been a major factor in the tremendous drop in crime since the peak in the early 1990s. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas is one of the few, and he has this op-ed in the WSJ with the above headline.
While the House bill has some flaws, the Senate can fix them on a bipartisan basis. But under no circumstances should Congress cut mandatory minimum sentences for serious crimes or give judges more discretion to reduce those sentences. That foolish approach is not criminal-justice reform--it's a jailbreak that would endanger communities and undercut President Trump's campaign promise to restore law and order.
LINCOLN -- Maynard Helgeland turned to driving a taxicab because he could do the job with two prosthetic legs.
He had lost his legs as a result of an alcohol addiction that also cost him his marriage and damaged relationships with his three children
But by Aug. 27, 1979, Helgeland had gotten sober and was working to reconnect with his children until he was shot in the head after picking up a fare.
That fare, Carey Dean Moore, is scheduled to be executed Tuesday for killing Helgeland and a second cabdriver five days earlier.* * *Reuel Van Ness enjoyed the time he spent taking people around Omaha in his taxicab.He drove the cab to supplement his other jobs. The money came in handy to help support his family of 10 children and stepchildren.
But the job cost Van Ness his life on Aug. 22, 1979, when a fare shot him three times and stole $140.
Mr. Helgeland and Mr. Van Ness were both veterans of the Korean War. Moore was finally executed today.
The headlines are all about the use of fentanyl and the resumption of executions after a long hiatus, but I think it is good to remember the victims first.
The following table gives the number of days from nomination to the commencement of hearings for the last four Justices nominated by Democratic Party Presidents and the scheduled date for Judge Kavanaugh:
Nominee | Nominated | Hearing Begins | Days |
Ruth Ginsburg | 22-Jun-1993 | 20-Jul-1993 | 28 |
Stephen Breyer | 17-May-1994 | 12-Jul-1994 | 56 |
Sonia Sotomayor | 01-Jun-2009 | 13-Jul-2009 | 42 |
Elena Kagan | 10-May-2010 | 28-Jun-2010 | 49 |
Average | 43.75 | ||
Brett Kavanaugh | 10-Jul-2018 | 04-Sep-2018 |
56 |
A similar calculation for the total time from nomination to confirmation shows that if Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed in a "mad rush" equal to the average for the above four nominees, he will be on the Court by September 17, in time to participate in the "Long Conference" and the opening of the new term.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has fired agent Peter Strzok, whose anti-Donald Trump text messages prompted sharp criticism over his handling of two politically charged investigations.
His attorney, Aitan Goelman, said Mr. Strzok was fired Friday. The FBI didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Strzok was the lead agent on the FBI probe into Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state. He later served as the lead agent in the early days of special counsel Robert Mueller's inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Mr. Mueller removed him from the probe a year ago, after the Justice Department inspector general uncovered Mr. Strzok's exchange of tens of thousands of text messages from 2015 through 2017 with a former FBI lawyer, Lisa Page, with whom he was having an affair.
Mr. Strzok testified in July on Capitol Hill that he never permitted his views to affect his official actions, a stance Republicans contested.
Fifteen states are siding with Nevada in a state Supreme Court fight against drug companies suing to prevent the use of their products to execute a condemned inmate.
In what a national death penalty expert on Tuesday called a setup for a showdown, documents filed with the Nevada Supreme Court argue that drug company Alvogen's effort to block the use of its sedative midazolam in the stalled execution of Scott Raymond Dozier in Nevada is part of a "guerrilla war against the death penalty."
"The families of these victims deserve justice," Arkansas' state Attorney General Leslie Rutledge said in a statement Tuesday. Arkansas is leading the 15 states that include Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Utah.
"If Alvogen is allowed to succeed," the Monday friend of the court filing said, "there is a substantial risk that pharmaceutical companies -- prodded by anti-death penalty activists and (defense attorneys) -- will flood the courts with similar last-minute filings every time a state attempts to see justice done."
A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war, or with any offense punishable by death, may be tried and punished at any time without limitation.
Aaron Ford's future would look a lot brighter if he'd been more honest in the past.
Last Friday, Ford -- the state Senate majority leader and the Democratic candidate for attorney general -- sat down with Steve Sebelius of KLAS-TV, Channel 8, to reveal he had been arrested numerous times in the 1990s. The reasons for his run-ins with the police included stealing, public intoxication and failing to appear in court.
"These things are not at all indicative of who I am," said Ford. "I would hope that people are able to look at the body of work over the last 25 years of my life and be able to judge me on that and not judge me on bad decisions I made as a college kid."
Ford then went further, asserting it was "illegitimate" to discuss his arrest record as he seeks to become Nevada's chief law enforcement officer. That's some chutzpah.
But Ford's larger contention -- that he's moved past the mistakes of his youth -- is undone by his recent and repeated dishonesty.
This appeal presents the question of whether, in the absence of congressional authorization, the Executive Branch may withhold all federal grants from so-called "sanctuary" cities and counties.